《Evaluationofagentplatforms.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Evaluationofagentplatforms.pdf（9页珍藏版）》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、Evaluation of Agent Platforms Rafa Leszczyna Cybersecurity and New Technologies for Combating Fraud Institute for the Protection and security of the Citizen Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy Rafal.Leszczynajrc.it June 30, 2004 Abstract. To provide appropriate agent environment for the studies of d
2、evel- oped and researched agent security architecture 16 agent standards compliant agent platforms were evaluated. First a literature study o existing widely avail- able evaluations had been conducted then it was extended with comparison of platform against proposed criteria related to currentness o
3、f agent platform. The results of assessment were presented. Finally the one platform was selected. The platform was also recommended for use in PIPS project. 1 Introduction Agent platform is a technological architecture providing the environment in which agents can actively exist and operate to achi
4、eve their goals. The agent platform may additionally support the development of agents and agent based applications. The aim of the study was to choose appropriate agent platform to provide envi- ronment for examinations of security architecture which aims at supporting agents security 16. At the sa
5、me time the platform might be a proposition of technological architecture for Personalised Information Platform for Health and Life Services (PIPS) 1121 - the large-scale distributed, highly dynamical environment aiming at facilitated delivery of healthcare to the European Public. PIPS foresees inte
6、gration of numerous existing legacy systems and consisting of diverse components. It was agreed that development of such environments may profit from using the agent tech- nology 15. The platform was chosen between nine FIPA compliant agent platforms, after studying of available existing agent platf
7、orm evaluations and extending this with assessment against proposed criteria related to currentness of platforms. 2 Standards compliancy The importance of standards cant be ever overvalued and neednt to be explained here. The first criterion for selecting the most adequate agent platform is its comp
8、li- ancy to agent standards. Only two organizations provide standards for agent technology. These are: Foun- dation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA) and Object Management Group (OMG). Other agents related standardization processes exist 625 but they mostly deal with communication languages and
9、 development of semantic web. They are connected to agent technology in the sense that agents can take advantage of them to communicate and to represent their knowledge. FIPA publishes twenty three standard specifications describing different aspects of agent technology: agent communication, agent m
10、anagement, agent message transport, and agent abstract architecture and agent applications. OMG in its one document “Multi Agent Facility” (MAF) 14 also specifies agent management and the elements which in FIPA approach constitute abstract architecture: agent and agent system names, agent system typ
11、es, location syntax. In these overlaying areas the OMG ap- proach is slightly less abstract and suggests use of Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) 20. The OMG effort is also more a bottom-up activity while FIPA is more top-down. Until release of FIPA 2000 specification, the main diffe
12、rence between specifications was that MAF addressed the mobility aspect of agent while FIPA didnt. This situation changed with already mentioned FPA 2000 specification which dealt with agents mobility and tried to integrate FIPA and MAF. The specifi- cation was later assigned the state of deprecated
13、 but it doesnt affect the fact that both specifications cover the agent mobility to quite the same level since work on MAF finished with the latest release in 2000 and has been longer conducted. On the other hand FIPA is still active and supports its standards and the agent technology with diverse p
14、romoting activities. Taking these all facts into consideration the choice of agent platform should be made between platforms conforming FIPA specification while non obligatory MAF compliancy may be perceived as added value. On its home site FIPA publishes the list of platforms compliant with its spe
15、cifica- tions. The list encounters ten platforms: Agent Development Kit 24, April Agent Platform 18, Comtec Agent Platform, FIPA-OS 7, Grasshopper 9, JACK Intelli- gent Agents 1, JADE 12, Java Agent Services API 13, LEAP (now subcompo- nent of JADE) and ZEUS 10. The platforms are shortly described a
16、nd links to host internet sites are given. The next step was to formulate other criteria to choose between the ten FIPA com- pliant platforms. To achieve so a literature study of existing agent platform evalua- tions was conducted. The literature study also gave a basic opinion about value of examin
17、ed platforms. 3 Literature study As far as the author of this paper knows there are only five English-written agent platform evaluation documents publicly and widely available 2341923. The approaches presented there differ in complexity and comprehensiveness. For example 2 proposes very comprehensiv
18、e criteria consisting of numerous standalone require- ments, interworking requirements and special requirements. This study could be more useful if it was more recent (it was published in 1998) and more of exercised plat- forms were FIPA compliant than only Grasshopper. The 23 on the other hand prop
19、oses different approach which relates to four stages of software engineering: analysis, design, development and deployment and generally relies on assessing how an agent platform supports each of the stages. Finally authors discuss the strengths and weaknesses of four compared platforms: AgentBuilde
20、r, JACK, MadKit and ZEUS. Publications 3 and 4 share multiple common criteria: standards compatibility, security protection, communication and agent mobility (strong - ability of system to migrate code and execution state of executing unit or weak - migration of code only). Moreover 3 takes under co
21、nsideration agent life cycle and product-related criteria while 4 assesses availability, usability and documentations and development issues (practical applications/development projects) of agent platforms. The latter evaluation may be handful, since it is mostly focused on FIPA compliant platforms
22、and assesses all of platforms being in interest of this paper. After examination authors recommended subsequently: Grasshopper, JADE and Aglets (the last is not FIPA compatible). Another interesting study is presented in 19 where authors evaluate three agent platforms JADE, Tryllian and SAP (the fir
23、st two are on FIPAs list) against diverse performance criteria. The situation in the domain of agent technology changes very quickly in the sense that it is quite possible that platforms described before one year can be no longer maintained or even unavailable. This is because the technology is rela
24、tively novel and mostly in research phase. The greater number of platforms was released by academic environments or companies laboratories for research purposes. Being aware of this fact no one can base only on previous works to choose appropriate agent platform. The knowledge must be updated and th
25、e information about which platforms are still on the market obtained. To achieve so the author put the following questions to be answered for each evaluated platform: Is the platform still maintained? Is the platforms authors research group still active? Is the platform being developed? Is the platf
26、orm popular? Is it in broad use? Is the platform easy accessible? What is the date of the latest release of platform? Does a light-weighted release of the platform exist? How is the platform available? The tables presented in the next section illustrate the results of evaluation. 4 Platform actualit
27、y Table 1. Is the platform still maintained? Agent Development Kit Yes April Agent Platform No evidence, since last platform release in October 2002 Comtec Agent Platform No longer accessible via URL given on FIPA homepage FIPA-OS No evidence Grasshopper No evidence of any activities since November
28、2003 JACK Intelligent Agents Available, maintained, but commercial JADE Available, maintained JAS (Java Agent Services API) This Java Community Process has status: in progress, but no evidence of any activities since May 2002. ZEUS Rather not. The last version of ZEUS is dated to 23 May 2001 and the
29、 ZEUS homepage was last updated in Jan 2002. Table 2. Is the platforms authors research group still active? Agent Development Kit Yes. Tryllian is commercial company which creates adaptive enterprises through the Distributed Business Process Integration Suite. By using Java technology & services Try
30、llian facilitates complex organizations and business communities to increase their enterprise agility. April Agent Platform No evidence, since last platform release in October 2002 Comtec Agent Platform Rather not nor platform or any information accessible FIPA-OS No current evidence. In 2003 Emorph
31、ia focused on assistance for administrative tasks that involve people- to-people collaboration, specifically the negotiation and coordination of meetings. Grasshopper No current evidence. The latest accounted activity is dated on October 2003. IKV+ is a company providing business customers with cons
32、ultancy, information tech- nologies and customized solutions for the provision of communication and information services. JACK Intelligent Agents Yes. The (AOS) is the developer and supplier of soft- ware products for building and deploying agent-oriented applications. JADE Yes. The JADE-Board is a
33、not-for-profit organization with the mission of promoting the evolution and the adoption of JADE by the mobile telecommunications industry as a java-based de-facto standard middleware for agent-based applications in the mobile personal communication sector. Currently the JADE Board lists 3 members:
34、TILAB (Telecom Italia Lab), Motorola, and Whitestein Technologies AG. JAS Probably. On Java Community Process homepage it is written that work on JAS is in progress however the latest document was issued 20 Mar 2002. ZEUS No evidence, since last platform release in May 2001 Table 3. Is the platform
35、being developed? Agent Development Kit Yes April Agent Platform No recent information evidencing any development activities since last version of platform was released in October 2002. Comtec Agent Platform Rather not nor platform or any information accessible FIPA-OS No recent information evidencin
36、g any development activities since last version of platform was released is available. Grasshopper No recent information evidencing any development activities since last version of platform was released is available. JACK Intelligent Agents Yes JADE Yes, very actively JAS No JAS implementation of th
37、e FIPA abstract platform available ZEUS No recent information evidencing any development activities since last version of platform was released is available. Table 4. Is the platform popular? Is it in broad use? Agent Development Kit Tryllian inform about their company partners rather than users. Ap
38、ril Agent Platform No information provided Comtec Agent Platform Rather not nor platform or any information accessible FIPA-OS About 50 000 downloads Grasshopper No information provided JACK Intelligent Agents AOS Group inform about their partners rather than us- ers. JACK has established a worldwid
39、e customer base, with sales handled from AOS in the US, UK and Austra- lia. JACK product support is available worldwide JADE About 40 000 downloads JAS No JAS implementation of the FIPA abstract platform available ZEUS No information provided Table 5. Is the platform easy accessible? Agent Developme
40、nt Kit Yes, from ADK homepage. For more information about purchasing the ADK 3.0 for commercial use or educa- tional purposes it is necessary to complete and send the Information & Evaluation Request Form and our ADK. April Agent Platform Yes, from SourceForge Comtec Agent Platform No, it is not acc
41、essible FIPA-OS Yes, from SourceForge Grasshopper Yes, from Grasshopper homepage http:/www.grasshopper.de/ JACK Intelligent Agents Yes, from JACK homepage. It is compulsory to fill in the registration form and become a user. http:/www.agent- JADE Yes, from JADE homepage. It is compulsory to fill in
42、the registration form and become a user. JAS No JAS implementation of the FIPA abstract platform available, but the JCP homepage is http:/www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=87 ZEUS Yes, from ZEUS homepage Table 6. What is the date of the latest release of platform? Agent Development Kit Ver 3.0. April Age
43、nt Platform Date: October 17, 2002. Ver: 4.4.4. Comtec Agent Platform Platform not accessible FIPA-OS Date: 2003-03-18. Ver: 2.2.0. Grasshopper Ver 2.2.4, but no date easily achievable JACK Intelligent Agents Ver: 4.1. JADE Date: 17 December 2003. Ver: 3.1 JAS Last JAS activities ended 19 May, 2002.
44、 ZEUS Date: 23/05/2001. Ver: 1.2.1. Table 7. Does a light-weighted release of the platform exist? Agent Development Kit No April Agent Platform No Comtec Agent Platform Rather not nor platform or any in- formation accessible FIPA-OS MicroFIPA-OS Grasshopper No JACK Intelligent Agents iPAQ JACK Runti
45、me JADE LEAP JAS No ZEUS No Table 8. How is the platform available? Agent Development Kit It is necessary to complete and send the Information & Evaluation Request Form and probably pay for commer- cial license. April Agent Platform Open Source. GNU General Public License. Comtec Agent Platform Not
46、available FIPA-OS Open Source. Public Domain. Grasshopper Free of charge for non commercial use. JACK Intelligent Agents It is necessary to complete registration form. Evaluation version of JACK is for free. Commercial version is for fee. Academic version is discounted. JADE Open Source. GNU General
47、 Public License. It is com- pulsory to fill in the registration form and become a user. JAS This API is not available. ZEUS Open Source. Mozilla Public License. 5 Conclusions When looking at the tables above it clearly appears that the choice is not as wide if wanted to use currently maintained and
48、developed FIPA compliant platform. The only platforms satisfying these criteria are ADK, JACK and JADE. But when one want not only maintained but also well supported (documentation, mailing list, plat- form updates) and free platform there is only one choice: JADE. JADE is licensed under Lesser Gene
49、ral Public License (LGPL), meaning that users can unlimitedly use both binaries and code of the platform. About popularity of JADE can say the number of 40 000 downloads of the platform. Since the PIPS project foresees the use of mo- bile devices it is important to have a light-weighted release of the platform. For JADE such distribution exists - the JADE Lightweight Extensible Agent Platform (LEAP). JADE is continuously developed, improved and maintained, not only by the develop- ers from the Telecom Italia