《Presentation Evaluation Sheet.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Presentation Evaluation Sheet.doc（5页珍藏版）》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、PowerPoint Presentation Evaluation Sheet Evaluators Name _ Period _ Given the criteria for an effective presentation, rate the presentation on a scale of 15.5Excellent4Above Average3Average2Below Average1Not EffectiveTOPIC OF PRESENTATIONContent(The presentation was factual and informative. The majo
2、r points were made clearly and concisely) Text Formatting (Font type & size is readable; no spelling/ grammar errors) Organization (content is well organized and easy to read.) Delivery(speaks clearly, makes eye contact, and delivers smoothly.) Attractiveness (Use of font, color, graphics, effects,
3、etc.) Total Points (out of 25) EVALUATING A PRESENTATIONTOPIC OF PRESENTATION:Given the criteria for an effective presentation, rate the presentation on a scale of 15.5Excellent4Above Average3Average2Below Average1Not EffectiveIn the space provided below each detail, note specifics as to why you rat
4、ed the presentation this way.Presentation Detail:Rating:Message is focusedDesign is simple, easy to read, appropriate for the contentAttractive colors that make the slides easy to read.Concise Text: (limit 6 lines w/ 6 words per line)Only one concept per slideAppropriate use of White SpaceFontsno mo
5、re than 2 fonts, bold and italics used sparingly, text not smaller than 18 pointVisuals used effectively to communicate the message (do not overcrowd a slide)Oral Presentation Evaluation SheetAs discussed in class, your oral presentations are evaluated on content, organization and delivery. I have s
6、tructured this evaluation sheet into these three categories to provide clear feedback in terms of your presentation. Areas for improvement are indicated with a mark next to related criteria. Please feel free to discuss this evaluation with me during office hours.Student name: _ 1. CONTENT:o Clear ob
7、jective or thesis stated. o News item or issue summarized effectively. o Social problem defined clearly in terms of social origin, definition and/or treatment. o Social problem analyzed in relation to key concept(s) from weekly chapter reading. o Social problem and/or proposed solution(s) discussed
8、in relation to approaches and ideologies presented in Chapter 1 of text (e.g., enemy blaming and interactional approach, manifest and latent effects, etc.). o Questions answered in relation to class materials and readings. o Other: o Comments/Notes: 2. ORGANIZATION: o Notes prepared and/or obvious r
9、ehearsal. o Provide set or hook for listeners. o Listeners informed of key ideas to be discussed (i.e., structure). o Use of discourse markers to maintain focus on key issues (e.g., the main idea is, the second point I wish to make is, In conclusion, etc.) o Provides closure for presentation by summ
10、arizing main point and link to set. o Other: o Comments/Notes: 3. DELIVERY:o Clear enunciation of words and appropriate volume. o Not read from script. o Appropriate modulation of voice to maintain listeners attention. o Good use of eye contact with listeners. o Audio/visual materials appropriate fo
11、r presentation (e.g., amount, use of, visibility, appearance, etc.) o Delivered in assigned time (i.e., not too long or too short). o Professional manner/appropriate for university class. o Other: Comments/Notes: Overall mark out of 5.ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORMAdventures in Critical ReadingNa
12、me of presenter: 1. What was the topic?2. What main point or points do you recall?Please rate each of the following statements by circling the appropriate number on the scale below it. Add any comments and suggestions below each question or on the back of this sheet. Try to be fair and constructive.
13、 3. The presentation was well-planned and effectively organized. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 4. The major points of the presentation were made clearly and concisely. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree5. The speaker gave class instructor a copy of the
14、outline before the talk.Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 6. The Speaker read the poem well. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 7. The speaker applied the 5 levels to the poem (pp. 24-26): context, retelling, interpreting, critical evaluation, personal mean
15、ing).Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 8. The Speaker carried out adequate additional background research (dictionary, proper pronunciation of unfamiliar words, explaining things listeners might not know).Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 9. The presentati
16、on was factual and informative. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 10. I enjoyed listening to the speaker and learned something. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 11. The presentation followed time guidelines: 4-8 minutes. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
17、8 9 10 Strongly Agree 12. Verbal portions of the presentation were clear and understandable. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 9. The speaker effectively used handouts, blackboard, overhead, computer equipment, or other audio-visual materials. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
18、8 9 10 Strongly Agree 13. The presenter(s) displayed interest and enthusiasm in the topic. Strongly Disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strongly Agree 14. Overall, the presentation merits the following grade (circle one): D- D D+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+15. Overall, Id like to offer the following words of praise and criticisms:Please hand in your evaluations to class instructor at the end of todays session, so that I can record the grade in my computer. This evaluation sheet will be returned to the speaker next week.