《Supervising MPhil & PhD studentsWriting a literature review.ppt》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Supervising MPhil & PhD studentsWriting a literature review.ppt（33页珍藏版）》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、Supervising Masters irrelevant; outdated; tedious; repetitive; bewildering; Baker and Freeland, 1975). These deficiencies For example, the are some of the objections (Baker, 1976). In addition, the data validity (Dumbleton, 1986). Furthermore, many models did not in decision making (Lee, et al., 198
2、6). Lastly, most of the models did not allow decision makers to priority structure associated with the multiple objectives.,Reviewing - Example 4 (final),In summary, recent writings have used the concept of tradition as an intellectual phenomenon to relate . There are a number of common themes in th
3、e writings examined. First, there is an acceptance that . Second, this relationship depends not so much upon There is also general agreement upon the dimensions of this intellectual and attitudinal base.,Reviewing - Example 5 (draft),Definitions of food security used over the last ten years reflect
4、an evolution from concern for early warning, to improved prediction and understanding of the structural processes and outcomes for prevention of food insecurity. As well as broadening the focus of definitions, geographical concerns . Consequently there is a need for a sound generic definition that p
5、rovides a structural framework applicable to a range of . Operational definitions of food security can be formulated from this general framework according to the specific context.,Reviewing - Example 5 (contd),One of the first definitions was given by . Since then food security has been defined in v
6、arious ways . However, the various definitions illustrate genuine differences in emphasis between the scale and dimensions of . While there may be differences, most definitions include five components which form the framework of the food and nutrition system:,Reviewing - Things to remind your studen
7、ts,Provide an OVERVIEW; remain in control Clarify WHOSE CRITIQUE it is Use SPECIFIC DETAIL when relevant Develop and assess DEFINITIONS CLUSTER similar studies and review the body of work Make use of SECTION SUMMARIES RE-WRITE at several stages,Seek comments & talk about your work with,Your supervisor Fellow research students Website: PhD: First Thoughts to Finished Writing http:/www.uq.edu.au/student-services/linkto/phdwriting/ Mullins, G & Kiley, M. (2002). “Its a PhD, not a Nobel Prize”: How experienced examiners assess research theses. In Studies in Higher Education V.27, N.4.,