Lightweight Concrete – An International Perspective:轻质混凝土–国际视角.ppt

上传人:本田雅阁 文档编号:2274324 上传时间:2019-03-15 格式:PPT 页数:21 大小:1.32MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
Lightweight Concrete – An International Perspective:轻质混凝土–国际视角.ppt_第1页
第1页 / 共21页
Lightweight Concrete – An International Perspective:轻质混凝土–国际视角.ppt_第2页
第2页 / 共21页
Lightweight Concrete – An International Perspective:轻质混凝土–国际视角.ppt_第3页
第3页 / 共21页
亲,该文档总共21页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

《Lightweight Concrete – An International Perspective:轻质混凝土–国际视角.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Lightweight Concrete – An International Perspective:轻质混凝土–国际视角.ppt(21页珍藏版)》请在三一文库上搜索。

1、Design of Appropriately Constructed Facilities to Cope With Global Warming,By Ted Bremner Professor Emeritus & Honorary Research Professor University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada Prague October 2012,Current best estimates forecast only minor warming in the equatorial regions including I

2、ndia while large temperature rises are now occurring in the polar regions.,2,NOTE: India has very low surface temperature increase between 1976 and 2001.,3,Warming World,4,5,The cumulative effects of our past and present action have set in play dynamic forces that will destroy the planet unless we a

3、ct in a more decisive way. Simply to stop peddling on a bicycle going down a progressively more steep hill will not avert disaster.,There are many examples of this with perhaps the most serious in the Arctic where the organic rich permafrost is thawing, and their decay will cause release of green ho

4、use gases that in turn cause global warming. If not now, eventually the process becomes self sustaining without input from us.,6,To avert disaster, global warming caused mainly by greenhouse gases must be reduced everywhere in all possible ways. Excessive behavior of humans is the main cause but for

5、tunately people can change their ways quickly, as witness: USSR morphing into separate countries. Reduction of acid rain in eastern North America. Elimination of DDT in Canada in 1957. Elimination of lead in gasoline in Canada and the US. Mandating sustainable forest usage in most of the world.,7,As

6、 producers of construction materials we have: Reduced carbon dioxide emission from cement manufacture by up to 50% by replacing cement with fly ash, slag and silica fume. Recycled metals with 60% of steel being made from scrap. Perfected the art of recycled asphalt. Through the use of insulation and

7、 green roofs reduced the energy required for heating and cooling buildings. Developed an accounting procedure to evaluate the carbon foot print of our constructed facilities.,8,Unfortunately, as designers of constructed facilities, we have not come up with new design concepts that reflect the needs

8、of a world under stress. This includes strategies to cope with rising sea levels and to provide affordable housing and effective public transportation.,9,A Canadian cement company had this slogan bravely stated in bold red letters on the bottom of its correspondence, “CONCRETE FOR PERMANENCE”. In th

9、e 1960s the use of air entrainment with a high enough cement content and a low water content was intended to assure customers that the concrete would be durable for eternity. Unfortunately alkali aggregate reaction, delayed ettringite formation and corrosion of embedded reinforcement shortly led to

10、the removal of the slogan.,10,Veigh, in his book “Conception of the Theory of Environmentally Compatible Structures and Structural Materials (ECS)”, emphasizes the need to rethink how most buildings are constructed, and stresses what can be learned from nature. Surface structures rather than post an

11、d beam structures clearly make the most effective use of our new materials. Also, if trends in the cost of energy continue, then solutions to global warming problems will need more complex structures.,11,The first step is to realize that affordability is of prime concern to avoid a U.S. housing cris

12、is type problem. Recent advances in the use of foam and cellular concrete indicate that this relatively mature technology can be used for low-cost housing, although it is considerably underutilized at the present time.,12,The term “Environmentally Compatible Structures” encompasses both the risk fro

13、m the materials and the risk posed by the structure itself. In the case of materials there is a well-developed understanding of the need to guard against the use of hazardous materials such as asbestos, arsenic and mercury from the combustion of coal. Less well appreciated are the hazards associated

14、 with the short and long term effects of effluents created by the mining industry.,13,In places where rising sea levels and storm surges are likely to occur, retreating in an orderly manner seems the only practical approach. A report prepared for the Canadian Department of the Environment by the Rou

15、nd Table on Climate Change (Report No, 4) indicates a strong preference for this approach (6). This study found that building dykes to hold back the sea was highly uneconomical and totally impractical, if not impossible, in many threatened sites.,14,In the past two decades the type of constructed fa

16、cilities needed by the military has changed somewhat as we go from multi-national wars to national wars. An example of recycling military discards is in Moscow where an abandoned inter-continental missile silo became the foundation for a very large vibrating table for research on earthquake resistan

17、ce of high-rise buildings, but this is still an exception.,15,In both developed and developing countries there is a need to recognize the fragility of the situation. In the developing world, changes need to be made to alleviate financial crises that inevitably must result in more economical and more

18、 appropriate housing and public facilities. In North America and in most of the developed world we have built extravagantly, and now smaller and more modest housing is necessary.,16,The level of funding needed to solve the problems associated with global warming on a government, industrial and indiv

19、idual basis is likely to be unavailable. Those of us involved in providing solutions must manage to do business in a cost-conscious and more stressed world, while at the same time producing more appropriate constructed facilities.,17,Setting National Limits,Kyoto Protocol (2008) Most Nations commit

20、to limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Durban Negotiations (2011) China and India can avoid any legal limits on their fast-rising carbon emissions. European Countries make progress but USA and Canada renig. ? Protocol (2015) Negotiation of rules for greenhouse gas emissions. ? (2020) Negotiated rule

21、s will come into effect. Global Warming (2030) will have exceeded the tipping point for maintaining a sustainable Planet.,18,19,Solution,It is apparent from the previous table that there is no solution to global warming unless the USA and China recognize that they must take the lead in reducing it.

22、Global warming and scarcity of water are interrelated and these two countries apparently are not now sufficiently concerned to commit to change. For change to occur nations immediately must come together to share water resources.,20,Conclusion,Recent advances in construction materials have been such that greater usefulness can be expected, and those who are designing facilities need to make more effective use of what is available. bremnertunb.ca http:/www.unb.ca/fredericton/engineering/depts/civil/people/bremner.html,21,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 其他


经营许可证编号:宁ICP备18001539号-1