《农林论文居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《农林论文居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价.doc（4页珍藏版）》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价 居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价 Landscape Simulation and Evalution of Residential Garden 【中文摘要】 园林绿地景观模拟评价可评价园林景观设计方案的质量,提高园林绿地设计的合理性,对于城市景观建设具有十分重要的意义。本文以居住区园林绿地景观为例,从居住区景观模拟评价媒介的构建方法、景观模拟评价媒介的真实性比较、景观模拟评价手段的有效性分析及SD法在景观模拟评价中的应用等方面开展了对居住区未建成景观的模拟评价研究,建立了居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价的方法。主要研究结果如下:(1)研究了应用计算机技术构建居住区景观静态模
2、拟媒介和动态模拟媒介的方法,结果表明:3D静态图像和VRML动态图像可作为景观方案设计的有效表达形式。从制作的难易程度上看,3D静态图像制作简易,VRML动态图像制作较难,与编程的方法相比经3D软件转化而来的VRML动态图像清晰度更高。(2)应用实验室评价与网络调查作为评价手段,比较了评价媒介的真实性与评价手段的有效性。结果显示,3D静态图像、VRML动态图像与VRML静态图像的真实度差异显著,3D静态图像与VRML动态图像的真实性差异不显著。3D静态图像与VRML动态图像的真实度较高,二者均可以清晰地表达设计方案的设计意图,VRML静态图像真实度较低。实验室评价与网络调查的媒介真实度差异较小
3、,网络调查可作为实验室评价的有益补充。(3)研究了应用SD法进行居住区景观模拟评价时不同评价媒介以及不同评价手段对评价结果的影响。应用SD法对居住区景观质量进行量化,经单因素方差分析结果表明:以3D静态图像与VRML动态图像作为媒介的方案评价结果相似,以VRML静态图像为媒介的方案评价结果上与前二者在三维的、二维的,清晰放映设计、模糊反映设计的形容词对得分上差异显著。以实验室评价与网络调查评价为手段的方案评价结果相似,二者均可作为基于SD法的景观模拟评价媒介。(4)研究了SD法作为居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价方法的有效性。景观模拟评价中,SD法形容词对的有效设置,可以反映目标方案的景观评价构成因
4、素。选取合适的形容词对,利用3D静态图像和VRML动态图像两种评价媒介与实验室评价与网络调查两种评价手段对居住区景观进行模拟评价,评价结果显示在实验室评价与网络调查中大部分形容词对的得分差异不显著,形容词对可以被评判者清晰的认知,表明SD法具有较高的可靠性,可以作为居住区景观模拟评价的有效方法。 【英文摘要】 Simulation evaluation of green landscape can evaluate the quality of landscape design, enhance the reasonableness of the urban landscape constru
5、ction is of great significance.Based on residential areas green landscape garden as an example,from the residential area evaluation of the media landscape simulation approach to building,landscape simulation evaluation of the authenticity of the media,the visual simulation evaluation of the effectiv
6、eness of means and SD in landscape simulation evaluation of the areas In the residential area of uncompleted visual simulation evaluation studies,the establishment of a residential area garden green landscape simulation evaluation methods.The main result are as follows:(1) On the application of comp
7、uter technology to build residential area landscape static simulation of the media and the media dynamic simulation.It was concluded 3D and VRML static images and dynamic image as a landscape design can be an effective form of expression.It is easy to production images by 3D static images and VRML d
8、ynamic image production more difficult,. Compared with programming methods,3D and VRML software has quality image when imageto -digital conversion(2) Assessment and application of the laboratory network surveys as evaluation tools to compare authenticity of evaluation media and authenticity of evalu
9、ation means.The results showed that,There was difference of among 3D images,VRML dynamic image,VRML static images and the original image.There is little difference between 3D image and VRML dynamic image.3D static images and VRML dynamic image have high quality,both of which can clearly express desi
10、gn intent,VRML static images has poor quality.There is little difference of quality of laboratory evaluation and investigation of the media network,the network survey can be used as a useful supplement laboratory evaluation.(3) On the application of SD method in landscape simulation to evaluate diff
11、erent media and different evaluation tools to evaluate the impact of evaluation results.Choice of the three simulated landscape perspective,the application of the SD method residential areas to quantify the quality of landscape,the single factor analysis of variance results showed that:3D static ima
12、ges and VRML dynamic image as a media programme evaluation results similar.VRML static images for the media evaluation of the programme with the results in the three-dimensional,two-dimensional and designed to reflect clear and ambiguous response to the design of the adjective scored significantly.T
13、o the laboratory evaluation and network survey as a means of evaluation of the programme similar to the results,as they are based on the SD method landscape simulation evaluation tools.(4) On the SD method as a residential garden landscape simulation evaluation of the effectiveness of the method.Eva
14、luation of simulated landscape,SD Adjectives in SD method on the effective settings,to reflect the objectives of the programme evaluation of the landscape components. Select the appropriate right adjectives,using 3D static images and VRML dynamic image of two evaluation and laboratory evaluation of
15、the media and network investigation as evaluation tools in residential garden landscape simulation evaluation,evaluation results show that in the laboratory evaluation and network survey are most adjectives score difference was not significant,the adjectives can be the judge of a clear understanding
16、 and the SD method is a high reliability,can be used as residential landscape simulation evaluation of the effective ways. 【中文关键词】 景观模拟评价; 居住区; SD法 【英文关键词】 Landscape Simulation and Evaluation; Residential; SD method 【毕业论文目录】 居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价摘要 4-5 Abstract 5-6 1 绪论 9-14 1.1 课题背景 9 1.2 景观模拟评价的研究现状 9-12
17、1.2.1 景观模拟的研究 9-10 1.2.2 景观模拟评价的研究 10-12 1.2.3 居住区园林绿地设计应注意的问题及发展趋势 12 1.3 居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价的目的及意义 12-13 1.3.1 居住区景观模拟评价的目的 12-13 1.3.2 居住区景观模拟评价的意义 13 1.4 研究的内容 13-14 2 景观模拟评价的理论基础及方法 14-27 2.1 景观评价的由来 14 2.2 景观评价的学派 14-16 2.2.1 专家学派 14-15 2.2.2 心理物理学派 15 2.2.3 认知学派 15 2.2.4 经验学派 15-16 2.3 景观评价在设计方案评价中
18、的应用 16 2.4 景观模拟 16-20 2.4.1 景观模拟原则 16-17 2.4.2 景观模拟媒介 17-18 2.4.3 计算机构建数字图像的技术支持与方法 18-20 2.5 景观模拟评价 20-26 2.5.1 景观模拟评价的研究过程 20 2.5.2 景观模拟评价的方法及实例 20-25 2.5.3 景观模拟评价的调查手段与人群的选择 25-26 2.6 本章小结 26-27 3 居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价媒介的构建 27-35 3.1 研究对象 27 3.2 居住区园林绿地景观模拟媒介的构建方法 27-32 3.2.1 居住区园林绿地景观静态模拟媒介的构建方法 27-31 3
19、.2.2 居住区园林绿地景观模拟自主漫游媒介的构建方法 31-32 3.3 讨论 32-33 3.4 本章小结 33-35 4 居住区园林绿地景观模拟媒介与评价手段的有效性分析 35-43 4.1 研究方法 35-39 4.1.1 景观模拟媒介的选取 35-39 4.1.2 实验室评价 39 4.1.3 网络调查 39 4.1.4 数据分析方法 39 4.2 结果与分析 39-42 4.2.1 评价媒介真实性比较分析 39-41 4.2.2 实验室评价与网络调查真实性比较与分析 41-42 4.3 本章小结 42-43 5 基于SD法的居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价 43-56 5.1 研究方法
20、43-45 5.1.1 评价媒介的选取 43 5.1.2 评价方法及内容 43-44 5.1.3 形容词对的选取与评价手段 44-45 5.2 结果与分析 45-54 5.2.1 基于SD法的评价媒介差异分析 45-49 5.2.2 基于SD法的评价手段差异分析 49-50 5.2.3 SD法有效性分析 50-52 5.2.4 基于SD法的园林园林绿地景观质量分析与评价 52-54 5.3 SD法在居住区园林绿地景观模拟评价中的应用探讨 54-55 5.4 本章小结 55-56 结论 56-58 参考文献 58-62 附录 62-63 攻读学位期间发表的学术论文 63-64 致谢 64-65