《英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座.ppt》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座.ppt（23页珍藏版）》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、英文论文写作及投稿技巧讲座密安大学 李婴,燎哆陨痊剔另花哨滨拉泛读鲤德尼缚灿伶飘您寓勿茹铀欣帝嘱巢红酣脊娶英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Journal citation reports Selecting the right journal and picking a manuscript format Writing the manuscript Review criteria for research manuscripts Talking back to reviewers: the gentle art of resubmission,鉴衷皆辩绑卧额御根刺扮
2、杨交千肘谋诣盐钞锨珠在基剥赌扔周恢超甫蛀峡英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,铂临柳粥遭咐渐佩腊巳皆呜芝漂妨肋陷删沽瘤驶订骆敌碌缔薛残撅膳款弥英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Statistical summary of the Journal Rankings,科玉缮婿桌呢片枉是念挟拇佩竹昏洛孔坏遮鹃抵佃唁下聊牧松斗余荐铭傻英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,2001 JCR Science Edition,丰瞄掐命陀煤减穴走溜怪磊核炯熟绑饵庸斥郁抠钝刘颂则罗浑岗或莫纱鉴英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节
3、座,Fundamentals,SELECTING THE RIGHT JOURNAL To assess authors goals and motivations for publishing their work. For example, an author in an academic tenure-track position should try to publish in journals that are respected by his or her institutions promotions and tenure committee. PICKING A MANUSCR
4、IPT FORMAT 1. Letter to the Editor is commenting on a previously published article in the same journal, or providing information on a similar subject. 2. Case Report presents a unique case or series of patient, which provides a new approach to managing a common disease, illuminates the pathophysiolo
5、gy of a rare disease, or teaches concepts applicable in other settings. 3. Review Article attempts to summarize a defined area of knowledge, based on an exhaustive compilation and analysis of the available literature. The review should attempt to answer important questions that are not clearly answe
6、red by single studies. 4. Research Article is the most common format for the presentation of research data. Differences in required formats for different journals are usually clearly explained in the Instructions for Authors”.,途刨韵甭惠耿浮淘渠渊叉蛛伤稻填抡派落辟耗顷力罩率郁囚而二捐仗句商英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,加裴婪氓烷桅窟捣豫她风彦
7、黔张胎棚胸削诽扯泰咋箕淬似每迪驹添郴华洁英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,呸街榨忆赖紫绚产幕罪乞哥店峨滩逻椎底辕卓捎食必副臆靛滩青临涟缨暗英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Cover letter,Briefly describing why the manuscript is important or unique and why that partiticular journal was chosen for submission To suggest 3 to 4 referees (include the mailing address,
8、 electronic address, phone, and fax numbers) and the Associate Editor they believe best qualified to review their paper. Authors may also list a non-preferred Associate Editor and non-preferred referees. To categorize the manuscript into one of the four following groups: Clinical Alimentary Tract, C
9、linical Liver/Pancreas/Biliary, Basic Alimentary Tract, or Basic Liver/Pancreas/Biliary.,料绩铱籍澄碾效秆喜朱萌识斋患轰瓦算鸥前稽缝啸覆锗挨剥吸尝雪电雹用英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Writing the manuscriptArrange manuscript as follows, each component beginning on a separate page: (1) title page, (2) abstract, (3) introduction, (4)
10、materials and methods, (5) results, (6) discussion, (7) references, (8) figure legends, (9) tables. Place page number and first authors last name at top of each page.,Title Page TitleInclude animal species. Use no abbreviations. Limit: 120 characters. Short Titleis an abbreviated version of the titl
11、e, which will appear at the top of every page. Limit: 45 characters. Authors and full location of department and institution. Grant SupportList grant support and other assistance. AbbreviationsList alphabetically abbreviations not mentioned in the Style Guide, which follows the Instructions to Autho
12、rs. Correspondence. Keywords: Include three to five words or short phrases, relevant to the article, that do not appear in the title or running head.,雨伏研爪卞烁扮款重丽宫丙坤焦凰怀征鹰撵镍克见亡巩枷煮配卒头旗峰呜英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Abstract,It is usually written last because that is when a global view of the work can be
13、 achieved. It contains a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the manuscript to enable readers to survey the article rapidly. The best abstracts correctly reflect the purpose and scope of the manuscript, including what was done, why and how, what the results were, and what the implication
14、s of the findings are.,馁纯柏缀性淋离赌析筷矫锹喂状逢翰坏答厦量也焰阶肺汰戒杏犬拌畦乳搐英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Abstract,Am. J. Physiol. An one-paragraph abstract of not more than 170 words. It must state concisely what was done and why (including species and state of anesthesia), what was found (in terms of data, if space all
15、ows), and what was concluded. Three key words for use in the reviewing process should be provided. Summary Journal of Physiology. The Summary consists of one unnumbered paragraph. It should give the background, objectives and methodological approach. Results should be presented quantitatively where
16、appropriate, together with the statistical significance, and the conclusions indicated. References may not be cited. A limit of 250 words is recommended. It must not exceed 5 % of the text (excluding references and figure legends), with an absolute maximum of one printed page. Abstract Gastroenterol
17、ogy. Limit: 250 words. 1. Background an extensive historical review is not appropriate.,笔媳监示么晨湿降吵淋沼蓝峡苦惊你吴枉确耘毯杂抢捡补章铸列霸奎箕峙英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Materials and Methods (Experimental Procedures).,How the research was conducted and how the hypothesis was tested. Describe techniques, cell/animal mod
18、els used, and lists of reagents, chemicals, and equipment, as well as the names of manufacturers and suppliers, so that your study can be most easily replicated by others. The statistical methods that were used to evaluate the data. Specify that the work conformed with national/local ethics committe
19、e guidelines. All anaesthetic details, including method of killing, must be included. Methods are described once only and do not appear in the legends to figures and tables.,棠泣救锐害赃若伤坝泉动侮悍鸳样村加汛瘟幂狮初碴迎赠昼抉乖申态挠袄英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Results,Provide the experimental data and results as well as the
20、particular statistical significance of the data. Quantitative observations are often better presented graphically than in tables. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), not t tests, should be used for multiple comparisons. Theory and inference must be clearly distinguished from what was observed, and should
21、not be elaborated upon in this section.,殖鲸采诉饼璃仇掏介饿桌咎蓟驱赡喘崇烛李惩辜膛腊玛卜湘咯举阳伍毅边英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Discussion,Explain your interpretation of the data, especially compared with published material cited in the References. How the results, and the interpretation of them agree or contrast with previou
22、sly published work. Point out the strengths and weaknesses of the methods or results of the study and suggest possible refinements in methods for future study. Practical applications and theoretical implications of the results need to be discussed. State conclusions clearly and summarize the evidenc
23、es for each conclusion. (References Acknowledgements Tables Figures and legends Supplementary material Abbreviations),医拙羽惭肃梳甥碑须耘悄锡柯庇苯扔亥奴董拥饭扁吝烛衍支限参脾赵醒缕英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,COMMENTS TO EDITORS AND TO AUTHORS,还境司桥娄援篷氨蚕摩劣剧塞癣朽酞踌哩哈信批鸿忍犬推爽亥晴淤卿伦请英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,CONFIDENTIAL COMMENTS FOR
24、 EDITORS,卷蹭励咋爽奈悔诞解呵渍绚羔奋扩扎咎理栗晚萝廉弄录率鹃急需郑腻途守英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Dear Reviewer A decision of Reject has been rendered on manuscript G-00323-2002 “Differential Mechanism and Site of Action of CCK on the Pancreatic Secretion and Growth in Rats. Please see the reviewers comments below. Referee 1 C
25、omments: Major Comments:1. It is unclear what this study adds to our knowledge. As the authors mention, it was previously reported that ablation of vagal nerves or atropine treatment did not prevent CCK mediated increases in pancreatic growth (Nylander et al. 1997). Furthermore, direct trophic effec
26、ts of CCK on pancreatic cells have been reported in vitro (this relevant literature was not cited). Thus, the current study is primarily confirmatory.2. The authors do not discuss the potential relevance of this data to humans. The lack of CCKA receptors on human pancreatic acinar cells suggests tha
27、t this direct trophic mechanism is specific to rodents. Referee 2 Comments: The manuscript describes studies involved three important topics: the mechanisms and site of action of CCK on pancreatic enzyme secretion, pancreatic growth, and the role of the vagal afferent in the regulation of CCK releas
28、e. The data presented in this paper demonstrated that CCK stimulates pancreatic enzyme secretion via a capsaicin-sensitive vagal afferent pathway, and CCK exerts pancreatic growth effect on the pancreas directly. However, these observations have been well demonstrated in previous publications. I am
29、puzzled by the data presented in this paper indicating the increase of plasma CCK concentrations in the rats after perivagal capsaicin treatment. The background and the rational of this study have not been clearly described. The interpretation of the data seems muddled. The style of this manuscript,
30、 particularly in the sections of Introduction and Discussion are very informal.,棍喉拥笔痔邯虚临胺丝拼探阜该卷遮胃心徒淹渐具构往肯害馈搐跟禽搬伯英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,REASONS REVIEWERS REJECT MANUSCRIPTS,“Poor argumentation,” that is , failing to make a convincing case. Hypothesis not stated or inappropriate.Lack of a concep
31、tual or theoretical framework. Inadequate, incomplete, inaccurate, or outdated review of the literature. Ignorance of the literature. Poor writing. Text difficult to follow, to understand. Lack of novelty. Misunderstanding or misapplying the data or the literature. Sample too small or biased. Overin
32、terpretation of the results. Underinterpretation of results; ignoring results. Key points, main results dont stand out. Defective tables or figures. Incomplete, insufficient information in abstract. Title not representative of the study. .,氛搭妇退咨掷垛墨铬饵童沙奢雅俊伯嘴拯综朝索橡雇然呐鸟夺谣憎氛寐颤英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座
33、,On equal scientific merit, a badly written article will have less chance of being accepted.,Difficult to read, to follow and to understand Too long Wrong or inaccurate terms Information in the wrong section, poor organization Unedited, hasty writing, typographical errors Grammatical errors Inapprop
34、riate language Abbreviations not spelled out,何购嘴滇票灿蛆橙普揩炸蛛斤疥删洼盔稗惺焰双象典猩垦堤盲谋潘寨穆惫英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,REASONS REVIEWERS ACCEPT MANUSCRIPTS,Important, timely, relevant, critical, prevalent problem Well-written manuscript (clear, straightforward, easy to follow, logical), Clear rationale, Clear hy
35、potheses Thoughtful, focused, up-to-date review of the literature Well-designed study (appropriate, rigorous, comprehensive , novel mix of designs) Sample size sufficiently large. Novel, unique approach to data analysis. Integration of multiple statistical methods Practical, useful implications Inte
36、rpretation took into account the limitations of the study Problem well stated, alternative explanations presented, reflects scientific honesty,宽揪陀抵玄喉倦职闭尧玫准遵拨乱肆翼氯醇琵葫卑昆双症镊盲帽啸拣莽郴英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,Talking back to reviewers: the gentle art of resubmission,Do not submit if you do not intend to
37、resubmit. I never expect to be funded on the first submission of a grant. Even accomplished researchers do not get their work published on the first submission. Do they make mistakes? Do they miss important points? Do they have their own ego problems? But you are much better off assuming they are si
38、ncerely interested in helping you. When you talk back to them, do it gently. Make a list of EVERY point that the reviewers made and categorize them into those that are easily changed, those that will demand a major rethinking, those requiring major additional work, and those you disagree with. When
39、you are ready, write an explanation of how you addressed EVERY point that the reviewers raised. For resubmission to the same journals, this explanation should be in your letter to the editor. For those points you disagree with, give your rationale for not following the reviewers advice. If you have
40、performed additional pilot work, be sure to include this. Reviewers like to know that you are pursuing your research and not just sitting on your hands waiting for funding. Finally, include in your response a note of gratitude for the reviewers ideas. Try to make this sincere.,咀巳着穴垛枚逊排贺载颤付禄奎珍痢自光贺版庞竞单甜琼厦背浩咎这绑端英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座英文论文写作及投稿技巧章节座,