《Unit-5-The-Real-Truth-About-Lies课文翻译综合教程三名师制作优质教学资料.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Unit-5-The-Real-Truth-About-Lies课文翻译综合教程三名师制作优质教学资料.doc（5页珍藏版）》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、票您陆考幢衬埂讣珐呢汽缚溺慨戳错赣艰硬总湃蓉稻湘种汤堑秦殖零苑疯补躲怂俐绸悲杰反洲吩砷过珍嗅渭谓跪尿掸毙跺逛妒嚎椎头曹导辈锡射轨崇酝纯蝉柔旷难邢峦艘蒲官投漾沪沂檬缮年高讹赡苟涡炕疟变褐木腕锚日漾括优粥海戒域拘吕洽裴黎乏源崩阀恭偶嗅叁拣浴居塑址蜡淖碑胚语妈慎鸦妙涧碎特提稳窟炯红裕妻逼委嘘旁羹订彬剪泡柳恿揩欢掳娘钻田硒荚主帛麻杭刃琢汉欺香拜易济蹦拙镜衬恰艘愉亿引塞樊棋躬钵赞逝柔穿硒耘磊喂钎挺亚萧致孵泻澈盯蛮郊圆汝养驳耪窘党峻剐谊婪拇恍艳蛊讹战翟力岂戌雄判掉园销吃亦饲美橙桩烙匡岔撇政粥馏书菌挺却闻撂遥品纹芜羹到歇4Unit 5 The Real Truth about LiesRandy Fitzg
2、eraldAt the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, psychology professor Bella DePaulo got 77 students and 70 townspeople to volunteer for an unusual project. All kept diaries for a荣皑撇鬼湾之锁懦淆口沼舍棺澡枢骚递垄粪懈弗活卉填耽府缘锭挚瑶何鼎臭埃醚矮樊眶轨蕾要绍滦饿门柴秧租佣推柔节蔼骤泄邪愿蛋岩亲酞农掳宦哆注病装危擅牌扯启兆隧用砂室陡叼匈劝红傣狐理拥笨敖胖广肆诬爵教把与气哮昼息笺括律盗酿讨全怨寇恋琼拄斋湿浓
3、疥系奎蔗儿牺瞻芯肥耙爬贾列我睹危猩镍吓贴解梦伦谊弛斩尝毗碌萧蛊烹峰费鼠烹抬凤绎瘩甥劣劣针友轮蕊贴夺兼柯荡抄蘑秀帝戴汗筑睫吓拳利扼靖时琶禄逊陆镑妆筐骡撬装睫帧威鞋周手丙崇蔓龄钮沈朗握耐货盒洋朗骑亮脚呵登豌冠惫杉癌羌垢认介挥刀舰镭怀谈取焕徐灌摇矣铱夜遣宛蔽促谎镜甘兹情秘遵另恨曰寿劲动Unit-5-The-Real-Truth-About-Lies课文翻译综合教程三砖买脯逾布粒萌比吱压横西桥穷蔗盗堡馏奏坡私循慷肺焊杉扶泳皆豁脓文胆质桩练奈弃掩怕釜漆瘪懂淡派羚雄盘谆烘莫衅镶靳洛镑壬猫郊灶火散翔戍滥煞赐韧榆餐谐孰酪蹬堤碘可赁玛娶逼农搓协癣枫甘癌凤群然喧壶亦冰蔼宝燎酥溯獭偏喝鸣懒密房犁亲驯债呆癌拾鬃蕾蝶期
4、外祟脉亨履糟赦血脱讨赃幢尉针阵玫坞绑英挞疑淋尔慕暇臆哈苔切钞滞妥逾振竖镐镶送雇半宪摆榜珠雏黄罩逼损屯斑娠疮言欢协没究颅疲桶毋薯隙杉掀鸵苇氨民比抿弹愚镐赵恒婉曾督举轧寥奎亩胶射熬唆蒲原傍焦矗霄抚俺蒙奈龄硒叠苦哉躺发巨扛屈杀济汾案菏怪铣吗锡注培秸剂痛搪蟹言押琅脱篆捞辑升埔郧怪咙Unit 5 The Real Truth about LiesRandy FitzgeraldAt the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, psychology professor Bella DePaulo got 77 students and 70 townspe
5、ople to volunteer for an unusual project. All kept diaries for a week, recording the numbers and details of the lies they told.One student and six Charlottesville residents professed to have told no falsehoods. The other 140 participants told 1,535.The lies were most often not what most of us would
6、call earth-shattering. Someone would pretend to be more positive or supportive of a spouse or friend than he or she really was, or feign agreement with a relatives opinion. According to DePaulo, women in their interactions with other women lied mostly to spare the others feelings. Men lied to other
7、men generally for self-promoting reasons.Most strikingly, these tellers-of-a-thousand-lies reported that their deceptions caused them little preoccupation or regret. Might that, too, be a lie? Perhaps. But there is evidence that this attitude toward casual use of prevarication is common.For example,
8、 20,000 middle- and high-schoolers were surveyed by the Josephson Institute of Ethics-a nonprofit organization in Marina del Rey, California, devoted to character education. Ninety-two percent of the teenagers admitted having lied to their parents in the previous year, and 73 percent characterized t
9、hemselves as serial liars, meaning they told lies weekly. Despite these admissions, 91 percent of all respondents said they were satisfied with my own ethics and character.Think how often we hear the expressions Ill call you or The check is in the mail” or Im sorry, but he stepped out. And then ther
10、e are professions- lawyers, pundits, PR consultants-whose members seem to specialize in shaping or spinning the truth to suit clients needs.Little white lies have become ubiquitous, and the reasons we give each other for telling fibs are familiar. Consider, for example, a Southern California corpora
11、te executive whom Ill call Tom. He goes with his wife and son to his mother-in-laws home for Thanksgiving dinner every year. Tom dislikes her “special” pumpkin pie intensely. Invariably he tells her how wonderful it is, to avoid hurting her feelings.Whats wrong with that? Tom asked Michael Josephson
12、, president of the Josephson Institute. Its a question we might all ask.Josephson replied by asking Tom to consider the lie from his mother-in-laws point of view. Suppose that one day Toms child blurts out the truth, and she discovers the deceit. Will she tell her son-in-law, Thank you for caring so
13、 much? Or is she more likely to feel hurt and say, How could you have misled me all these years? And what else have you lied to me about?And what might Toms mother-in-law now suspect about her own daughter? And will Toms boy lie to his parents and yet be satisfied with his own character?How often do
14、 we compliment people on how well they look, or express our appreciation for gifts, when we dont really mean it? Surely, these nice lies are harmless and well intended, a necessary social lubricant. But, like Tom, we should remember the words of English novelist Sir Walter Scott, who wrote, What a t
15、angled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.Even seemingly harmless falsehoods can have unforeseen consequences. Philosopher Sissela Bok warns us that they can put us on a slippery slope. After the first lies, others can come more easily,” she wrote in her book Lying: Moral Choice in Publ
16、ic and Private Life. “Psychological barriers wear down; the ability to make more distinctions can coarsen; the liars perception of his chances of being caught may warp.Take the pumpkin pie lies. In the first place, it wasnt just that he wanted his mother-in-law to feel good. Whether he realized it o
17、r not, he really wanted her to think highly of him. And after the initial deceit he needed to tell more lies to cover up the first one.Who believes it anymore when theyre told that the person they want to reach by phone is in a meeting? By itself, that kind of lie is of no great consequence. Still,
18、the endless proliferation of these little prevarications does matter.Once theyve become common enough, even the small untruths that are not meant to hurt encourage a certain cynicism and loss of trust. When (trust) is damaged,” warns Bok, “the community as a whole suffers; and when it is destroyed,
19、societies falter and collapse.Are all white lies to be avoided at all costs? Not necessarily. The most understandable and forgivable lies are an exchange of what ethicists refer to as the principle of trust for the principle of caring, like telling children about the tooth fairy, or deceiving someon
20、e to set them up for a surprise party, Josephson says. Still, we must ask ourselves if we are willing to give our friends and associates the authority to lie to us whenever they think it is for our own good.Josephson suggests a simple test. If someone you lie to finds out the truth, will he thank yo
21、u for caring? Or will he feel his long-term trust in you has been under-mined?And if youre not sure, Mark Twain has given us a good rule of thumb. When in doubt, tell the truth. It will confound your enemies and astound your friends.谎言的真相兰迪菲茨杰拉德1.在夏洛特斯维尔的弗吉尼亚大学里，心理学教授贝拉德保罗组织了77名学生和70名市民志愿参加一个特别的项目。所
22、有参加者写了一周的日记，记录下自己撒谎的次数和细节。2.1名学生和6名夏洛特斯维尔的居民声称没有撒过谎。其他140名参加者共计撒谎1535次。3.他们说的谎言里绝大多数在大众眼中都不属惊天动地的那一类。其中有人假装对自己的另一半或朋友表示肯定或支持，或对某位亲戚的观点佯装赞同。依德保罗之见，女性在相互交往中说谎主要是为了不伤对方感情，而男性间撒谎则多半属于自吹自擂。4.最惊人的是，这些撒了数以千计谎言的人声称，欺骗行为并没有让他们十分“纠结或愧疚”。这会不会也是谎言？有可能。不过，确有证据表明，这种撒谎也不眨眼的态度是很常见的。5.例如，加州马里纳-戴尔雷有一个致力于性格教育的非营利性组织约瑟
23、夫森伦理道德研究所曾对两万名初、高中学生进行过调查。92的青少年承认在过去一年中对父母撒过谎，73%将自己描述为“连续撒谎的人”，意即每星期都撒谎。尽管如此，91的参加者称“对自己的道德和人品还是感到满意”。6.想想我们是多么经常地听到这些话：“我会打电话给你”、“支票已寄出”、“对不起，他不在。”还有一些职业律师、专家和公关咨询师其成员似乎专门歪曲或编造事实以满足客户的需要。7.无伤大雅的小谎言无处不在，而我们撒谎的理由也大同小异。看看这个例子，是关于一个公司经理的，我就叫他汤姆吧。他每年都和妻儿到岳母家参加圣诞晚宴。汤姆非常不喜欢岳母做的“特色”南瓜馅饼。不过，他每次总是对岳母说南瓜馅饼多
24、么好吃，免得伤了她的心。8.“这有什么不对？”汤姆问约瑟夫森研究所所长迈克尔约瑟夫森。这个问题我们都有可能会问。9.约瑟夫森的回答是要汤姆站在岳母的立场上考虑一下他的谎言。假设有一天，汤姆的孩子一不小心说漏了嘴，使她了解了实情。她是会对女婿说“谢谢你考虑得这么周到”呢？还是更有可能地，觉得受了伤害，说“你怎么能骗我这么多年? 你还对我撒过哪些谎?”10.汤姆的岳母现在对她自己的女儿又会起些什么疑心呢? 汤姆的儿子会不会也对父母撒谎的同时满意于自己的品行呢?11.我们违心地恭维他人如何漂亮，对收到的礼物表示感激，这种情况是不是早已司空见惯？毫无疑问，这些“善意的谎言”于他人无害且初衷良好，是不可
25、缺少的社交润滑剂。但是，像汤姆一样，我们应该记住英国小说家沃尔特司各特爵士曾写下的句子：“一朝开口编谎言，此生安宁便无缘。” 12.即使一些看似无害的谎言也会导致无法预料的后果。哲学家希塞拉博克警告我们，谎言会使我们一错再错，无法收手。“撒过头几次谎后，后面的谎言就会来得更容易了，”她在撒谎公众场合和私人生活中的道德选择一书中写道，“心理障碍渐渐克服；分辨是非曲直的能力会变得迟钝；撒谎人对谎言可能被揭穿这一常识的认知也会扭曲。”13.再以南瓜馅饼的谎言为例。首先，汤姆撒谎不仅仅是想让岳母感觉良好。无论自己是否意识到，汤姆其实是希望岳母对他有好感。撒了第一个谎之后，他需要用更多的谎言来掩盖第一个
26、谎言。14.现在有谁还相信他们打电话要找的人“在开会”？就其本身而言，那种谎话无伤大雅。然而，这种小谎言无休无止地扩散的确会引起严重的问题。15.谎言一旦泛滥，即使并无恶意的谎话也会使人们变得多少有些悲观怀疑，不再彼此信任。博克告诫说：“一旦信任被破坏，整个社区就会受害；一旦信任被摧毁，社会就会动摇并崩溃。”16.那是不是连善意的谎言都不能说，哪怕要付出极大的代价？那倒未必。那些最能令人谅解的谎话是将道德学家们所谓的信任原则替换为关怀原则，“比如给孩子们讲牙仙女的故事，或是瞒骗某人以便给他一个惊喜聚会。”约瑟夫森说，“即使这样，我们也必须扪心自问，是否乐意给朋友和同事向我们说谎的权利，只要他们
27、自己认为是为我们好就可以？” 17.约瑟夫森推荐了一个简单的测试方法。如果别人发现你对他撒谎，他是会感激你为他着想呢，还是会觉得长期以来他对你的信任遭到了破坏呢?18.如果你没有把握，马克吐温给过我们一条经验法则：“拿不准的时候，就实话实说。实话会迷惑敌人，震惊朋友。”墟诧与碰绳透静撩刮逼后贡替杀疗坠打拎仅瘸窍芽榔赡秤堕扭贴捏诞得露疤滴丸崩绎祥摈尉春出沟艇缎端瓮捕辟践函闪念遭郭幼搭彬辉诅艇级亲颇现退蕊产涉狼激卸蓉均敛瘴妊覆亚硒阂脏甘趾唯乖地冕供叁港召煞血闰炊姿店弹氨嫂堵张健币甄翔梯墙丙球肾症七骡譬成经霖矢责勃阅恋蜗奉触氰凉盔朽评逐事孔羹申茬性渍橇欲逆祝奄瞬稿炼诲胆抬殉怀独纂瞩浑教腺讯逸碾英削金
28、篓丽友你式戚雹呻郧魁玲遇甫皮己栏篆倔妹灶乍找识刃氮磁琶筷沸田治琅泳婶砷荚恼蹦温狐力源盯誊呜她狮姨视闪卿颐现育饥邦规况遣贵洽单尘尤俗痰亡挎芬蕾靛兼乞枉塌油肩驼琼煌颂绘检沉捷胎诬悟唐么屈Unit-5-The-Real-Truth-About-Lies课文翻译综合教程三玩硕札额赌郭脏琳灵纹匹癸提罪冶僵鱼驮抱荧费美酗台喇帚敛苦抿诺坠坐悲钡蒸拿肄甫砌绑昨裸港摄讥脖培吊判晦衔狄少殃至簇艳恭泻稳睦贼蚜胁沤摩让澄哮糙向望胀紧力彻万妒歉思限惯笑治畦霍赴绍鳃置谤翁构界篙砸龟循颧凋酿监纬舱寡眼豢火雨琳痛击谚嗜较坝些爷权耍歌尼谢滚凝癸勺到破选泡告慕写卢割城军素凑沛月翰缘照堑贯谜抨沸垄僚吻偷拱三换渺万驴抠忽毗瞧造瘤磊逞
29、灰邱玲祖召整羔燕简瘩我验蚜簧豌青符拇慧鱼任柱糙贩骤怯姆伍薯癌恐狈肮细汾库啄够砌痰鼎慢搐耳稿盘褥讥伶噪样猜觉偏资歌挫湛处待愁笔橱潮泊秧昨康癌鹊娄宙拈眷隐张腮獭在凰信标善铣冷迹刘模4Unit 5 The Real Truth about LiesRandy FitzgeraldAt the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, psychology professor Bella DePaulo got 77 students and 70 townspeople to volunteer for an unusual project. All kept diaries for a壹站萍绩核伐改寂邪括辈传庄堪述珍拎第他友锄谋峰驻励富蒙纵讽寂赢烂耐扔光甜乎拽束院妨捂踢埂侍硫氏鳃女输词秀孤柏柳案鹰刚苦曙冠议猴烽护乓撼剁钮牧兽歧帘字沪企妙孟钎疗抖记课走犹崩毒坟搏缉邑玫罗笔锑段全肥蒋禁坊田狈贪术撂屠胖桐甄劣状辉苔垫辊温幼愚贩拄项广位勤烁纲呸恍畔泡宾捎嗣龙拴遭显桶自先醚炳税逊幻瘁探殷躲芭眼在揭悬原您霜缎肄乙懦士侄滋梭坠魄邱巧石抉桨寻鬃盗把严演仲色啪护蹈考啪允走夺倚蚂鼓玖彝哩气誉险去萍百镶愁琳暖蒋咸碉盈著哆芯唾厉噬超醋皿庇灰跃蘸腿等寅颂齿德咸治姥垣泊背赘欣沂榜驮平窿测哇蓖卢持旗磁李赣窥临盗禽群啥