《新历史主义解读《哈姆雷特》6926683.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《新历史主义解读《哈姆雷特》6926683.doc（26页珍藏版）》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、毕 业 论 文学生姓名学 号院 (系)外国语学院专 业英语（师范）题 目新历史主义解读哈姆雷特New Historicist Reading of HamletA Thesis Submittedto School of Foreign LanguagesHuaiyin Normal Universityin Partial Fulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of Bachelor of ArtsByLiu LuSupervisor：Xu XiaobingMay 10, 2013淮阴师范学院毕业论文AcknowledgementsI w
2、ant to express my appreciation to many who supported my efforts in writing this dissertation during past few months.I am greatly indebted to Prof. Ms. Xu who patiently helped me and gave me a lot of useful information. It took her a large amount of time to read and improve my paper. Without her help
3、, I would have failed to finish my paper. I am deeply impressed by her hardworking spirit. Hearty thanks should also be given to Professor Zhang Xiuguo, who has offered the course Essay Writing that tell us how to write a well-formed thesis.Special thanks should be extended my classmates who show th
4、eir kind encouragement and useful suggestions to me during my writing process.iAbstractHamlet is regarded as the peak of Shakespeares artistic creation. From then on, the play has been studied by a large number of literary scholars, many of whom hold various opinions about the text, so-called “there
5、 are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand readers minds”. The objective of this thesis is to disclose the relationship between Hamlet and its historical context by applying the major theories of New Historicism, especially the New Historicist dictum of “historicity of text and textuality of history”
6、. Based on New Historicism, the thesis examines the text from three aspects: firstly, Shakespeares creational background of Hamlet; secondly, the influence of the historical context on Hamlet which makes the play a representation of the Elizabethan era and the specific effect of Hamlet on the constr
7、uction of the historical context of the Elizabethan era. Last，the important role playing in the development of drama and culture. Thus，the new historicist reading of Hamlet will highlight some cultural aspects of the text. Keywords: Hamlet; Shakespeare; New Historicism；historicity；textuality ii摘要哈姆雷
8、特是莎士比亚艺术创作的巅峰之作。时至今日，莎翁评论家依然对该剧众说纷纭，真所谓“有一千个读者就有一千个哈姆雷特”。本文运用“文本的历史性和历史的文本性”这一新历史主义最重要的理论，挖掘哈姆雷特与它所产生的社会历史环境间的“对话性”关系。本文从三个层面解析文本：首先探讨莎士比亚创作哈姆雷特的历史背景；其次哈姆雷特反映了伊丽莎白时代的特定历史背景，揭示历史对文本的影响；最终指出哈姆雷特在英国戏剧和文化发展中所起的重大历史作用。因此，本文将有助于文本的文化层面的解读。关键词：哈姆雷特；莎士比亚；新历史主义；历史性；文本性iiiContents1. Introduction12. An Introdu
9、ction to New Historicism22.1 The definition of New Historicism22.2 Major theories of New Historicism23. Hamletthe Product of Shakespeares Negotiation with the Historical Context43.1 The dynamic role Shakespeare played in creating Hamlet43.1.1 Shakespeare, a secret Catholic sympathizer43.1.2 Shakespe
10、ares interest in mental problems53.2 The submissive role Shakespeare played in creating Hamlet74. HamletA Realistic Representation of the Society in the Elizabethan Era84.1 A brief account of the religious and social background of the Elizabethan era94.2 Characters in Hamlet: typical figures of the
11、Elizabethan era104.2.1The role of Hamlet in the text104.2.2The role of Fortinbras in the text115. The Historical Power of Hamlet11iv5.1 Dramatic level125.2 Cultural level136. Conclusion14Works Cited16v1. Introduction Shakespeares Hamlet has aroused hot discussions among many critics in all ages. Fro
12、m the early 17th century, the play was famous for its ghost and vivid dramatization of melancholy and insanity, leading to a procession of mad courtiers and ladies in Jacobean and Caroline drama. This view changed drastically in the 18th century, when critics regarded Hamlet as a heroa pure, brillia
13、nt young man thrust into unfortunate circumstances. For example, Gilbert Murray said in his “Hamlet and Orestes” that “The things that thrill and amaze us in Hamlet . but things belong to the old stories and the old magic rites” (171). By the 19th century, literary criticism came to focus more on ch
14、aracter and less on plot. In the 20th century, criticism branched in several directions, discussed in context and interpretation. However, few critics pay much attention to its historical background. The author was invoked by them into a serious thinking about the specific relationship between Hamle
15、t and its historical background. Is Hamlet deeply influenced by the historical background? Does it have some influence on the history in return? And how did Shakespeare create such a play at that particular time? New Historicism offers a perspective for authors thinking because “the relationship bet
16、ween history and text remain in the center of the New Historicist arguments” (Zhu G 260). The theories of New Historicism would provide me with wider and firmer basis to make a systematic study on the relationship between Hamlet and its historical context, which in this specific aspect, could be mor
17、e in depth than the previous studies. The author would like to divide her dissertation into mainly four parts. In chapter 1, the author would give a brief introduction is given to New Historicism and its major theories, especially those which are feasible for the research on Hamlet to offer a theore
18、tical basis for my research. Author would focus on the author, Shakespeare in chapter 2, applying some theories of New Historicism such as “social energy” and “negotiation” to analyze how Shakespeare produced Hamlet. The next two chapters deal with the relationship between the text Hamlet and the hi
19、storical context of the Elizabethan Era with the help of the well-known New Historicist dictum of “historicity of texts” and “textuality of history” separately. In chapter 3, the author would discuss the influence of history on the text which makes the play a realistic recording of the Elizabethan E
20、ra. And the author would discuss in chapter 4 the influence of the text on the historical contextthe historical power of Hamlet. On the whole, the author would do a research on Shakespeares Hamlet from the perspective of New Historicism in order to show the important value of this play to analyze in
21、ter-influence between the play and the historical context of the Elizabethan Era, and to approach again to the relationship between history and text.2. An Introduction to New Historicism2.1 The definition of New Historicism According to the New World Encyclopedia, “New Historicism is an approach to
22、literary criticism and literary theory based on the premise that a literary work should be considered a product of the time, place, and historical circumstances of its composition rather than as an isolated work of art or text”. New Historicism suggests literature must be studied and interpreted wit
23、hin the context of both the history of the author and the history of the critic. New Historicists aim simultaneously to understand the work through its historical context and to understand cultural and intellectual history through literature, which documents the new discipline of the history of idea
24、s. Unlike previous historical criticism, which limited itself to simply demonstrating how a work reflected its time, it evaluates how the work is influenced by the time in which the author wrote it. It also examines the social sphere in which the author moved the psychological background of the writ
25、er, and the books and theories that may have influenced him or her. In New Historicists eyes, “a text can have neither a unified ideology nor an entirely aesthetic function” (Colebrook 24-25).2.2 Major theories of New Historicism New Historicism borrows the “Power Theory” from the famous Post-Struct
26、uralist Michel Foucault to analyze in depth the detailed relations between history and text. In Foucaults theory, power refers the relations of domination and resistance which saturate our social, political and cultural relations, but it can also refer to the ways in which power is a productive, eve
27、n pleasurable, part of our existence. It is everywhere; not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere (Foucault 93). Obviously, “power” here has a much broader application than the words like “politics” and “economy”, which are used by the traditional historicism. “Power a
28、lso needs to have subversion, otherwise it would be without the opportunity to justify itself, and to make itself visible as power” (Brannigan 8). As a result, certain text could be subversive to some extent, in the interest of power. Foucaults principal interest is how power diffuses itself in syst
29、ems of authority and how it affects of truth produced within discourses which in themselves are neither true nor false. In New Historicists opinion, literary texts are placed in the specific historical context and related to other non-literary texts which constructed within other specific historical
30、 context; similarly, history is regarded as a text of interrelated contexts. “Different New Historicists may have different inclinations to historicity and sexuality” (Zhu G 260). This is just the famous New Historicist dictum of “historicity of text and textuality of history”, which based on the Ne
31、w Historicist Louis Montroses theory. In Louis Montroses most famous dictum, the new orientation to history in literary studies may be characterized as a dynamic dialogue between literature and history and it has a reciprocal concern with “the historicity of texts and the textuality of history”. His
32、tory can influence text and in the meanwhile, it can also be influenced by text and is constituted by various texts. “The relationship between history and text remains in the centre of the New Historicist arguments” (Zhu G 206).Another important theory New Historicism has established is about the “w
33、riter”. Stephen Greenblatt argues that the writer as a subject is always doing “self-fashioning” within the historical context. We can understand the key point of this “Writer Theory” from the meaning of the word “subject”. “Subject” can refer to a person or a thing which can perform action accordin
34、g to its own will. It can also be used as an adjective, having the meaning of “to be submissive and governed by others”. So to be a “subject”, one has to be both “dynamic” and “submissive”. Since the “writer” has become a both dynamic and submissive “subject”, then what role does the writer play in
35、creating a specific work of art? “Negotiator” who has to negotiate with the historical context to create a “currency” (text) that is valid for a profitable “exchange”. Thus “the work of art is the product of a negotiation between a creator or a class of creators, equipped with a complex, communally
36、shared repertoire of conventions and the institutions and practices of society” (qtd. in Veeser 1989 12).3. Hamletthe Product of Shakespeares Negotiation with the Historical Context From the New Historicists point of view which has been discussed in the previous chapter, work of art can be seen as a
37、 product of negotiation between its creator and the historical context. Applying this theory to the study of Hamlet, we can argue that when Shakespeare was creating the play Hamlet, he was in fact, negotiating with the historical context. On one hand, he was a dynamic initiator of action who had his
38、 own sharply defined identity and interests; on the other hand, he was a submissive subject under the control of the historical context who had to yield his own initiative to the common and acceptable institutions of the society. 3.1 The dynamic role Shakespeare played in creating Hamlet3.1.1 Shakes
39、peare, a secret Catholic sympathizer We can summarize the dynamic role Shakespeare played with the details in this play. Greenblatt has made a name for himself both as a preeminent Shakespeare scholar and as one of the founders of the “New Historicist” approach to literary criticism. Central to his
40、approach is the notion that not only does history affect literature, but literature itself informs history, Shakespeare applied his own faiths and emotions to Hamlet just to fight against Puritanism in secret. Lets look back to Shakespeares life background. We can arrive at a conclusion that Shakesp
41、eare is a secret Catholic sympathizer. There are several evidences to prove it. The most obvious cue is that Shakespeares father, John Shakespeare, is a secret Catholic sympathizer in Shakespeares childhood, so Shakespeare is influenced by his family on some level. The reference of the first part of
42、 the Cambridge Companion to ShakespeareShakespeares life, it writes “John, like his son William, proved to be upwardly mobile. Having prospered for some twenty years, John ran into difficulties in the late 1570s. He was let off paying weekly for poor relief; he failed to attend council meetings, and
43、 consequently was deprived of his aldermans gown. It could be that he only pretended to be poor and withdrew from council business for religious reasons. if, like many others, he became a recusant when Queen Elizabeth succeeded Mary in 1558, i.e. he refused to give up the Old Faith, Roman Catholicis
44、m.” Shakespeare graduated from Oxford, as one member of several students who were Catholics or had Catholic connections. In that time, it is illegal to believe in the Roman Catholic faith, but Shakespeare signed a statement about the Roman Catholic faith which is found in an old house of the Henry S
45、treet in 1757.Shakespeare as a secret Catholic sympathizer, he applies his religious belief into his works Hamlet. During Elizabethan era, Purgatory is one of the Catholic doctrines. According to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Purgatory is the condition of purification or temporary punishment by
46、which those who die in a state of grace are believed to be made ready for Heaven. In Shakespeares time, Purgatory was common among people. By 1563, almost forty years before Shakespeares Hamlet was written, the Church of England had explicitly rejected the Roman Catholic conception of Purgatory and
47、the practices that have been developed around it. The Protestant Revolution had destroyed a “powerful method of negotiating with the dead” for most people in England. So the Purgatory appeared in Hamlet is reasonable. In the play, when Claudius was praying alone in the confessional, Hamlet gave up k
48、illing his uncle because he believe in the purgatory that confession can wash iniquity especially before the death that let his uncle go to heaven. Hamlet as a young man from Wittenberg, with a distinctly Protestant temperament, we can easily understand Hamlets elusory actions from the religious aspect. The Purgatory in Hamlet is quite obvious and is easy to accept.3.1.2 Shakespeares interest in mental problemsThe dynamic role Shakespeare played in creating Hamlet is also embodied by his interest in mental problems. In Elizabeths time, the bipolar has prevailed among people