上海肿瘤医院王中华_晚期乳腺癌治疗2012.05.09讲课.ppt

上传人:本田雅阁 文档编号:3076985 上传时间:2019-07-04 格式:PPT 页数:79 大小:5.45MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
上海肿瘤医院王中华_晚期乳腺癌治疗2012.05.09讲课.ppt_第1页
第1页 / 共79页
上海肿瘤医院王中华_晚期乳腺癌治疗2012.05.09讲课.ppt_第2页
第2页 / 共79页
上海肿瘤医院王中华_晚期乳腺癌治疗2012.05.09讲课.ppt_第3页
第3页 / 共79页
上海肿瘤医院王中华_晚期乳腺癌治疗2012.05.09讲课.ppt_第4页
第4页 / 共79页
上海肿瘤医院王中华_晚期乳腺癌治疗2012.05.09讲课.ppt_第5页
第5页 / 共79页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《上海肿瘤医院王中华_晚期乳腺癌治疗2012.05.09讲课.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《上海肿瘤医院王中华_晚期乳腺癌治疗2012.05.09讲课.ppt(79页珍藏版)》请在三一文库上搜索。

1、转移性乳腺癌内科治疗进展,王中华 2012.05.09讲课,Age Distribution,Data from Shanghai Cancer Institute,5-yr disease-free,5-yr recurrence,Gain from adjuvant chemotherapy,70%,30%,70%,10%,20%,Risk reduction: 30%20%, 10/30=33% Absolute benefit: 10% 70% always free 20% always recurred,超过 2/3 的乳腺癌复发为远处转移,远处转移 (61%-75%) 5年生存率

2、 41.3%,对侧乳腺癌 (9%-11%) 5年生存率83.4%,局部复发 (16%-28%) 5年生存率 59.3%,BIG = Breast International Group. Baum et al. Lancet. 2002;359:2131. Thrlimann et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;363:2747.,晚期乳腺癌治疗目的,控制疾病,缓解症状 提高患者的生活质量,延长高质量的生存期,全面评估,内分泌,化疗,乳腺癌的分子分型与内科治疗方法,Luminar A/B ER(+)和/或PR(+),Her-2 阳性,所有类型MBC 受体三阴性,全身化疗 针对所

3、有类型的晚期乳腺癌,晚期乳腺癌的化疗发展史,1955,1965,1975,1985,1995,2005,2015,Cyclophosphamide 1959,Methotrexate 1971,Doxorubicin 1974,Gemcitabine 2004,Capecitabine 1998,Lapatinib 2006,Accessed on-line at http:/www.fda.gov/cder/cancer/druglistframe.htm,Docetaxel 1996,Paclitaxel 1994,Trastuzumab 2000,Approved specificall

4、y for first-line use in MBC,Nab paclitaxel 2005,Ixabepilone 2007,Bevacizumab 2008,5-FU 1962,Platinums,晚期乳腺癌化疗适应证,病变发展迅速 内脏转移,如肝、肺广泛转移 无病生存期(DFS)2年 ER和PR阴性 既往内分泌治疗无效,化疗的应用方法,联合 Vs. 单药 (AB Vs. A) ORR TTP OS 或 联合 Vs. 序贯 (AB Vs. AB) TTP、OS未显示有明显优势,联合化疗 VS.单药,优先选择联合化疗 有广泛转移或 有临床症状,需要快速控制病情或 肿瘤进展迅速或 威胁生命的

5、转移或 患者的耐受性较好 优先考虑单药化疗 无重要脏器转移或 无临床症状或 转移部位少,辅助,首选,蒽环,蒽环类联合紫杉类 AT,蒽环类 CAF、CEF AC、EC,未化疗,CMF,复发转移性乳腺癌化疗药物选择原则,多西他赛联合卡培他滨 TX 紫杉醇吉联合吉西他滨 GP,或,蒽环类及紫杉类治疗失败,卡培他滨、长春瑞滨、吉西他滨、铂类、伊沙匹隆 、ABX,First-Line Second-Line Doxorubicin 35-50%1 25-30%1 Epirubicin 52-68% 28% Paclitaxel 29-63%1 19-57% Docetaxel 47-65%1 39-58

6、% Capecitabine 25%1 20-27%1 Gemcitabine 23-37%1 13-41%1 Vinorelbine 40-44%1 17-36%,1Esteva F et al, Oncologist 2001 (6): 133-146,单药治疗MBC有效率,白蛋白结合型紫杉醇 III 期临床试验: 试验设计,Gradishar et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:77947803,MBC,III 期临床试验:注射用紫杉醇(白蛋白结合型)显著延长了患者的至肿瘤进展时间,Gradishar et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:779

7、47803,标准紫杉醇l (n = 224),注射用紫杉醇(白蛋白结合型) (n = 229),中位时间 = 23.0 周 (19.426.1),中位时间 = 16.9 wks (15.120.9),无进展百分比,P = 0.006 风险比 = 0.75,周,0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96,104,112,120,III 期临床试验: 毒性,Gradishar et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:77947803,Capecitabine 1, 250mg/m2 BID days 114 + Docetaxel 175mg/m2

8、day 1,Docetaxel 100mg/m2 day 1,3-weekly cycles,n=255,n=256,OShaughnessy et al. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2812-2823,SO14999研究: 多西他赛联合希罗达 vs. 多西他赛,R,主要研究终点: TTP,Gemzar 1, 250mg/m2 BID days 1,8 + Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 day 1,Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 day 1,3-weekly cycles,n=529,OShaughnessy et al. J Clin Oncol. 200

9、2;20:2812-2823,JHQG 研究设计 紫杉醇联合吉西他滨 vs. 紫杉醇,R,主要研究终点: TTP,蒽环类和紫杉类均耐药乳腺癌的化疗,希罗达 伊沙匹隆 (Ixabepilone)希罗达 (2B) NVB GEM NVB 希罗达 NVB DDP/CBP GEM DDP/CBP,phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial 疗效: 毒副作用: GEMNVB vs. NVB G3/4 ANC下降 66 vs. 44 (p = 0.0074 ) ANC减少性发热 11 vs. 6 (p = 0.15 ) 非血液

10、学毒性两组无显著差异,蒽环和紫杉类治疗失败 GEMNVB vs. NVB,Lancet Oncology 2007; 8:219-225,gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 q21d,vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 q21d,PD,252 pts MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes,Epothilone: Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) Bristol-Myers Squibb,

11、New York, NY,Activity in multiple tumor models Low susceptibility to tumor resistance mechanisms MRP and P-gp efflux pumps () tubuiln overexpression tubuiln mutations Antitumor activity in taxane resistance models,S. cellulosum,Epothilone B,Ixabepilone,59%,36%,23%,22%,35%,12%,41%,Study Design: Inter

12、national, Randomized, Phase III trial, BMS 046,Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 IV over 3 hrs Day 1, every 3 wks + Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally BID Days 1-14, every 3 wks,Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally BID Days 1-14 every 3 wks,Patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer to anthracyclines PRE/

13、RESISTANT and taxane RESISTANT,Stratified by visceral metastases previous MBC chemotherapy anthracycline resistance study site,PD,Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine vs Capecitabine Alone,Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine vs Capecitabine Alone,Overall response rate* I + C vs C: 35% vs 14% (P .0001) PFS benefi

14、t for combination arm* (5.8 vs 4.2 mos) 辅助化疗后快速复发 (5.6 vs. 2.8 mos) 2008 SABCS,*As determined by independent radiologic review,Months,Proportion Progression Free,4,0,8,12,16,20,24,0.0,0.2,0.4,0.6,0.8,1.0,28,32,36,PFS by Independent Radiologic Review,Capecitabine,Ixabepilone + Capecitabine,HR: 0.75 (

15、95% CI: 0.64-0.88) P = .0003,Vahdat LT, et al. ASCO 2007. Abstract 1006.,Grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy: 23% for ixabepilone plus capecitabine vs 0% for capecitabine alone 感觉神经 / 累积性 / 可逆性 中位恢复至 G1 or 基线: 6 weeks,More hematologic toxicity observed in ixabepilone arm,Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine vs

16、 Capecitabine Alone,October 22, 2007 FDA Approves Ixempra (ixabepilone, Bristol-Myers Squibb) for Advanced Breast Cancer Patients The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Ixempra (ixabepilone), a new anti-cancer treatment, for use in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast canc

17、er who have not responded to certain other cancer drugs.,何时停药?治疗越长越好?,效不更方 至病情进展或不可耐受的毒性 选择其中一个药物 用至进展或不可耐受的毒性 更换其他一种化疗药 希罗达,PLD 更换成内分泌治疗 耐受性好,作用机制不同,减少耐药 停止用药(6-8周期后),观察 定期复查,进展再给予处理,三种不同剂量多西他赛治疗MBC,* P 0.05,Paclitaxel (200 mg/m2 )d2 + Epirubicin (90 mg/m2) d1 or Doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) d1,every 3 w

18、eeks 6-8cycles N=459,CR /PR /SD,Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2,no further chemotherapy,every 3 weeks 8cycles,*HR+ HT,Paclitaxel maintenance JCO, 2006,R,Gennari A, et al, JCO,2006,3912-8,N=215 (255),The primary end point : PFS,Gennari A, et al, JCO,2006,3912-8, MANTA1 study,Possible Explanation for MANTA1 stud

19、y (Paclitaxel maintenance),Use of concurrent endocrine therapy in 60% of hormone receptor-positive patients Control arm patients actual received maintenance hormonal therapy The concurrent of chemo and hormonal may reduce the efficacy Toxicity of paclitaxel Sensory neuropathy grade 2 occurred in 26%

20、, grade 3 in 6% and grade 4 in 2% of the patients in maintenance grade ANC 24%,GEICAM 2001-01 Study Phase III trial,288 pts MBC,2008 ESMO,observation,PLD 40mg/m2 q28d 6,一线,CR / PR / SD,AT (50/75) 6,155 pts,78 pts,77 pts,R,A:ADM T:TXT PLD:脂质体ADM,*Statistically significant; assessed in futility analys

21、is.,Randomized Studies of Chemotherapy Duration in MBC,MBC的化疗,为何用? 目的 何时用? 适应症 怎么用? 方法(联合、单药) 用何药? 三级选用(蒽环,蒽环耐药, 蒽环及紫杉均耐药) 何时停? 五种措施,生物靶向治疗 与化疗联合,Targeted therapies for breast cancer,mTOR,Tam,AI,Her-2阳性MBC Herceptin Lapatinib,HER2阳性定义,IHC 3+,CISH +,FISH +,或,或,免疫组织化学法(IHC) 色素原位杂交法(CISH) 荧光原位杂交法(FISH)

22、,Hercetpin单药治疗晚期乳腺癌的疗效, HO649g HO551g HO650 (关键试验) (期) (关键试验) _ N (intent-to-treat) 222 46 114 #CR 8 1 7 #PR 26 4 23 有效率 15 11 26 中位缓解期(月) 9.1 6.6 18.8 中位生存期(月) 13 14 24.4 _,Herceptin联合化疗一线治疗Her-2阳性MBC,H: Herceptin, T: TXT, P: PAX, C: CBP, X: Xeloda,曲妥珠单抗联合泰索帝:同时还是序贯使用? HERTAX,Bontenbal et al. ASCO

23、2008. Abstract 1014.,99 例 HER2 +, 一线 M+ 主要目的: PFS 次要目的: RR & OS,曲妥珠单抗每周 + 泰索帝 100 mg/m,曲妥珠单抗 每周,随机,泰索帝 100 mg/m,序贯,PD,Lapatinib 针对Her-2阳性MBC FDA于2007.3.13批准上市 规格250mg/150#,Lapatinib: Targeting EGFR and HER2,Lapatinib oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of ErbB1 and ErbB2 Blocks signaling through EGFR and

24、 HER2 homodimers and heterodimers May also prevent signaling between ErbB1/ErbB2 and other ErbB family members,Rusnak DW, et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2001;1:85-94. Xia W, et al. Oncogene. 2002;21:6255-6263.,Geyer CE, et al. ASCO 2006. Clinical Science Symposium.,EGF100151: Lapatinib + Capecitabine in Ad

25、vanced Breast Cancer,到疾病进展时间(ITT Population),70,20,40,60,80,0,100,10,20,30,40,50,60,0,Time (weeks),Patients Progression Free* (%),EGF100151,Geyer CE, et al. N Engl J Med 2006 ;355(26):2733-2743.,GBG-26:曲妥珠单抗加希罗达 vs. 希罗达,延长TTP近3个月(8.2m vs. 5.6m P0.05) EGF104900:曲妥珠单抗加拉帕替尼 vs. 拉帕替尼,显著延长TTP(2.8m vs. 1.

26、9m P=0.008),含曲妥珠单抗一线治疗Her-2阳性MBC进展后,von Minckwitz G et al. J Clin Oncol 2008: 26 (May 20 Suppl); abs 1025. OShaughnessy J et al. J Clin Oncol 2008: 26 (May 20 Suppl); abs 1015.,PCH 或wPCH,贝伐单抗,Paclitaxel Bevacizumab in MBC (E2100),N=715 Locally recurrent or 1st-line MBC,值得关注的是贝伐单抗组有更多感染、 3/4 级的高血压、蛋白

27、尿、头痛、 心脑血管局部缺血,Miller et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2666-2676,Results,Paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 d 1, 8, 15 q4w,Paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 d 1, 8, 15 q4w + bevacizumab 10 mg/kg d1, 15,Yellow text indicates statistically significant values.,R,Docetaxel Bevacizumab in MBC (AVADO),N=705 Locally recurrent or 1st-line

28、 MBC Stratification: Region Prior taxane/time to relapse since adjuvant chemo Measurable disease HR status,R,Docetaxel 100mg/m2 + Placebo q3w,Docetaxel + Bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg q3w,Docetaxel + Bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3w,Bevacizumab continued to disease progression; all pts given option to receive bevaciz

29、umab with 2nd-line chemo; docetaxel administered for maximum of 9 cycles,Miles et al. ASCO 2008. Late-Breaking Abstract 1011.,Phase III Studies: E2100 and AVADO,*Miller et al. N Eng J Med. 2007; *Miles et al. ASCO 2008 (LBA#1011).,Yellow text indicates statistically significant values.,E2100 and AVA

30、DO Safety data,*Miller et al. N Eng J Med. 2007; *Miles et al. ASCO 2008 (LBA#1011). *VTE: no increase in bevacizmab arm in either study.,Ongoing Phase III Trials Evaluating Bevacizumab in First-Line MBC,GEICAM 2006-11,AVEREL,HER2+ Disease Trastuzumab-containing regimens,Hormonal therapy,RIBBON 1,RI

31、BBON 1,RIBBON 1,Capecitabine,AVADO,Single-agent taxane therapy,Anthracycline-based chemotherapy,Bevacizumab,晚期乳腺癌的内分泌治疗 针对Luminal A/B 的 MBC ER(+)PR(+) ER(+)或 PR(+),内分泌治疗与化学治疗,内分泌 改变肿瘤的内环境来抑制其生长 对正常细胞影响小,副作用小 28周起效,缓解期长 不需要升白、止吐等支持治疗 治疗费用较低,化疗 阻断肿瘤复制来杀死肿瘤细胞 对正常细胞有杀伤,副作用大 12周起效,缓解期短 常需要升白、止吐等支持治疗 治疗费用

32、一般较高,晚期乳腺癌内分泌治疗适应证,患者年龄35岁 无病生存期(DFS) 2年 骨和软组织转移;无症状的内脏转移 ER和或PR阳性,晚期乳腺癌的内分泌治疗,月经状况 治疗药物 绝经前 戈舍瑞林 (Goserelin, zoladex) 亮丙瑞林 (Leuprolide acetate) 绝经后 瑞宁得(Anastrozole ) 来曲唑( Letrozole) 依西美坦 各种年龄 他莫昔芬,孕激素,阿那曲唑的一线疗效优于TAM,Arimidex (anastrozole) versus Tamoxifen for the First-line Treatment of Advanced Br

33、east Cancer in Postmenopausal Women from Trials 0030 and 0027 Known to be Receptor-positive,025试验设计 : 来曲唑 vs. 他莫昔芬 作为晚期一线治疗,Mouridsen et al. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19: 2596.,试验人群: 绝经后; 局部晚期或局部复发或转移的乳腺癌; ER 和/或 PgR阳性或未知,来曲唑的一线疗效优于TAM,非甾体类 AI 失败后的内分泌治疗MBC,芳香化酶抑制剂作用机理: 非甾体 VS 甾体,雄激素,非甾体类(抑制剂) (eg, anastroz

34、ole, letrozole),芳香化酶,甾体类(灭活剂) (eg, exemestane),Geisler et al. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:2089-93.,EFECT: Evaluation of Treatment Options Following AI Failure,Fulvestrant IM injection loading-dose regimen* (n = 351),Exemestane 25 mg/day orally (n = 342),Postmenopausal women with hormone receptorpositive

35、, progressing/recurring advanced breast cancer after nonsteroidal AI (N = 693),Progression, death, or withdrawal,*Fulvestrant loading-dose regimen comprised 500 mg on Day 0, 250 mg on Days 14 and 28, and 250 mg monthly thereafter.,Gradishar W, et al. SABCS 2006. Abstract 12.,EFECT: Similar TTP in Pa

36、tients Treated With Fulvestrant or Exemestane,Gradishar W, et al. SABCS 2006. Abstract 12.,Exemestane: 3.7 months Fulvestrant:3.7 months P=.65,绝经后MBC的内分泌治疗,一线,二线,三线,TAM,孕激素,雄激素,AI,TAM,孕激素,辅助,AI,孕激素 ?,氟维司群 ?,TAM ?,1985,2002,新方向 靶向联合内分泌,2008 SABCS,EGF30008:拉帕替尼联合来曲唑 随机期临床,2008 SABCS,PFS,P:拉帕替尼,L:来曲唑 T

37、:TAM,绝经后 ER/PR阳性 MBC一线,受体三阴性乳腺癌,Triple-Negative BC and PARP Inhibition,BRCA1 BRCA2,1. DNA damage via platinum adducts and DNA crosslinking,2. PARP1 up-regulation Base-excision repair,3. PARP1 inhibition,4. Replication fork collapse Double strand DNA break,CELL SURVIVAL,CELL DEATH,PARP1,PARP1,BSI-201

38、,Pt,Pt,Pt,Pt,Pt,PARP1,PARP: 聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶,Phase II Trial of BSI-201: Schema,Patients receiving gemcitabine/carboplatin could cross-over to the other treatment arm upon documented disease progression.,RANDOMIZE,21-Day Cycle,BSI-201 (5.6 mg/kg, IV, d 1, 4, 8, 11) Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, IV, d 1, 8) Car

39、boplatin (AUC 2, IV, d 1, 8) N=61,Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, IV, d 1, 8) Carboplatin (AUC 2, IV, d 1, 8) N=62,RESTAGING Post-Cycle 2 & every 6-8 wks,Metastatic TNBC N = 120,Phase II Trial of BSI-201 Results: Efficacy,OShaughnessy et al. ASCO 2009;Abstract 3.,Phase II Trial of BSI-201 Results: Safety,N

40、o differences in hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities No differences in GC dose reductions between arms,转移性乳腺癌内科治疗共识,晚期乳腺癌的主要治疗目的是提高患者的生活质量,延长高质量的生存期 由于新药的不断问世以及合理使用,晚期乳腺癌治疗的疗效不断提高 化疗与内分泌治疗是治疗晚期乳腺癌的两种同用有效地治疗方法,但分别有各自的适应证 对Her-2neu阳性的患者,化疗联合生物治疗能显著提高疗效 通过合理的内科治疗,能显著延长患者的生存期,部分患者甚至能够长期生存,THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 其他


经营许可证编号:宁ICP备18001539号-1