血管搭桥手术的时代过去了吗?(英文).ppt

上传人:本田雅阁 文档编号:3568110 上传时间:2019-09-12 格式:PPT 页数:41 大小:2.72MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
血管搭桥手术的时代过去了吗?(英文).ppt_第1页
第1页 / 共41页
血管搭桥手术的时代过去了吗?(英文).ppt_第2页
第2页 / 共41页
血管搭桥手术的时代过去了吗?(英文).ppt_第3页
第3页 / 共41页
血管搭桥手术的时代过去了吗?(英文).ppt_第4页
第4页 / 共41页
血管搭桥手术的时代过去了吗?(英文).ppt_第5页
第5页 / 共41页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《血管搭桥手术的时代过去了吗?(英文).ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《血管搭桥手术的时代过去了吗?(英文).ppt(41页珍藏版)》请在三一文库上搜索。

1、Is the age of the Cerebral Bypass Gone?,Jonathan White, M.D. Associate Professor of Neurosurgery UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas,Historical Indications For Bypass:,Vascular replacement: Complex aneurysms Tumors Ischemia Moya Moya disease Atherosclerosis,Historical use of bypass?,Fukushi

2、ma 1986-2006 100 patients, Saphenous vein Aneurysm, Menigioma, carotid body, glomus, other Three types of bypass Petrous to paraclinoid Cervical external to petrous Cervical external to M2,Things Change,Traditional ways no longer needed:,Better Technology?,Tumors:,Better microsurgery Microscope Ultr

3、asonic aspirator,Tumors: Gamma Knife,Aneurysms?,Better microscope Better clips Intra-operative angiography Anesthesia Better surgeons? Better surgical training,Aneurysms: Coils and Stents,What about Ischemia?,Results of Bypass Studies: Bypass does not work,N Engl J Med. 313 (19):1191-2000, 1985, Nov

4、 7. 714 Medical and 663 STA-MCA bypass patients Followed 56 months No difference overall between groups Some surgical subgroup did worse: MCA stenosis, carotid occlusion with TIA,Angioplasty and Stent,Does new technology and information eliminate the need for traditional techniques?,Gamma Knife?,Gam

5、ma knife results,Poor control with large volume tumors Risk of vascular injury,Aneurysm Coiling?,UT Southwestern 2002-2006 95 aneurysms greater then 2.0 CM 17 were treated by primary endovascular Only 9 (53%) completely occluded 12 (71%) required re-treatment,Ischemic disease: Flaws of previous bypa

6、ss trials,Pre operative strokes considered surgical failure Selection bias good surgical candidates not randomized Medical failure cases did not cross Not enough power to identify subgroups which may benefit from bypass,Ischemia: Need to measure at risk tissue,Yonas, J NSG 1993 Xe CT; compared 5% vs

7、 50% drop in flow with diamox 68 patients for 24 months 4.4% vs 36% stroke risk in low flow Pts Grubb, JAMA 1998 PET evidence of high oxygen extraction, 31 month 11/39 (28%) vs 2/42 (5%) ipislateral stroke risk,STA-MCA bypass for ischemia:,STA-MCA bypass,STA-MCA bypass,STA-MCA bypass,STA-MCA Bypass,

8、STA-MCA results,Japanese EC-IC Bypass trial (JET) 1st 206 patients, surgery group has significantly fewer strokes Stanford study of Moya Moya patients Decreased future risk of stroke Regression of Moya Moya collaterals Coss trial High risk group randomized,Traditional techniques still have role.,Carotid replacement Complex aneurysm Skull based tumor Ischemic disease Measure blood flow to find at risk tissue Select proper patients,Concluding Case:,Combined Techniques,Combined techniques,Combined Techniques,Combine past and future,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 其他


经营许可证编号:宁ICP备18001539号-1