Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf

上传人:椰子壳 文档编号:3730687 上传时间:2019-09-22 格式:PDF 页数:137 大小:777.86KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共137页
Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共137页
Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共137页
Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共137页
Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共137页
亲,该文档总共137页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

《Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease.pdf(137页珍藏版)》请在三一文库上搜索。

1、 1 Advances in the Discovery of Biomarkers for Alzheimers Disease Opportunities presented by “omics” and imaging technologies for the development of diagnostic tests Reference Code: BI00041-004 Publication Date: December 2011 2 About the author Dr David Templeton has over 25 years experience in acad

2、emic and pharmaceutical industry research, including time in major pharma, innovative biotech, and generic drug development. His expertise spans discovery pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical pharmacology. He has held management positions in several organizations, including Xenova, Pfizer, GSK, an

3、d Eisai. His drug discovery expertise has been focused principally on neurodegeneration, including stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimers disease. He has also been responsible for the clinical introduction of novel therapeutics in Alzheimers disease. He graduated from the University of Glasgow w

4、ith an honors degree in pharmacology and also completed his PhD in the Department of Pharmacology at Glasgow. Disclaimer Copyright 2011 Business Insights Ltd This report is published by Business Insights (the Publisher). This report contains information from reputable sources and although reasonable

5、 efforts have been made to publish accurate information, you assume sole responsibility for the selection, suitability and use of this report and acknowledge that the Publisher makes no warranties (either express or implied) as to, nor accepts liability for, the accuracy or fitness for a particular

6、purpose of the information or advice contained herein. The Publisher wishes to make it clear that any views or opinions expressed in this report by individual authors or contributors are their personal views and opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views/opinions of the Publisher. 3 Table of

7、Contents About the author 2 Disclaimer 2 Executive summary 10 Introduction 10 Biomarkers in Alzheimers disease 10 A and tau as biomarkers 11 Genomics and non-genomic factors 12 Transcriptomics 12 Proteomics 13 Biomarkers in saliva and urine 14 Metabonomics 14 Imaging 15 Use of cognitive testing to d

8、etect preclinical Alzheimers disease 16 Chapter 1 Introduction 17 Summary 17 Introduction 17 Phases of AD: model of preclinical, MCI, and dementia 19 Chapter 2 Biomarkers in Alzheimers disease 26 Summary 26 Introduction 26 Biomarker definitions 28 4 Chapter 3 A and tau as biomarkers 30 Summary 30 In

9、troduction 30 Amyloid 31 Background 31 Developments in understanding of the toxic species of A 33 Tau 34 A/tau as biomarkers in CSF and plasma 35 CSF amyloid and tau 35 A and tau aids differentiation of AD from other dementias 37 Plasma A as a biomarker in AD 39 Plasma tau as a biomarker in AD 42 Ot

10、her CSF biomarkers 42 A oligomers 46 ALZAS protein 47 BACE1 47 Clusterin 49 Isoprostanes 49 Proteomic 15/17 panel 50 Ubiquitin 51 Chapter 4 Genomics and non-genomic factors 53 Summary 53 Introduction 53 Genetic factors in FAD 54 Genetic risk factors in sporadic AD 55 Apolipoprotein E 57 5 TOMM40 58

11、Other AD genes 59 Non-genetic risk factors 59 Age 59 Homocysteine 59 Chapter 5 Transcriptomics 61 Summary 61 Introduction 62 Non-coding RNA 62 miRNA 62 Long ncRNA 67 BACE1 antisense 67 RNA splice variants 68 38A/17A 70 Exonhit 71 DiaGenic 72 Epigenetic control of RNA in AD 73 Summary 77 Chapter 6 Pr

12、oteomics 79 Summary 79 Introduction 79 Plasma proteomic screen in AD 79 Chapter 7 Biomarkers in saliva and urine 85 Summary 85 Introduction 85 Saliva 86 6 Urine 88 Chapter 8 Metabonomics 90 Summary 90 Introduction 90 Key developments 91 Chapter 9 Imaging 93 Summary 93 Introduction 94 Volumetric MRI

13、as a neurodegeneration marker 94 FDG-PET detects functional changes in AD 96 11C-PiB amyloid imaging 98 Chapter 10 Use of cognitive testing to detect preclinical Alzheimers disease 102 Summary 102 Introduction 102 Cognitive testing in AD 103 Chapter 11 Conclusion 108 Conclusion 108 Appendix 112 Meth

14、odology 112 Primary research 112 Secondary research 112 Scope 112 7 Abbreviations 113 References 119 8 Table of figures Figure 1: Hypothetical model of the phases of AD 22 Figure 2: Detailed description of the preclinical phase of AD 23 Figure 3: A production from APP 32 Figure 4: Stages of neurotox

15、icity 35 Figure 5: Regulation of BACE1 by miRNA 66 Figure 6: Regulation of homocysteine metabolism 75 Figure 7: Chemical structures of Thioflavin-T, PiB, and GE-067 100 9 Table of tables Table 1: Tau and A in the differentiation of AD from other dementias 37 Table 2: Potential CSF protein biomarkers

16、 (part 1) 44 Table 3: Potential CSF protein biomarkers (part 2) 45 Table 4: Potential CSF protein biomarkers (part 3) 46 Table 5: Genetic associations in FAD 55 Table 6: Genetic associations in sporadic AD (part 1) 56 Table 7: Genetic associations in sporadic AD (part 2) 57 Table 8: NextGen Sciences

17、 human CSF AD 37-plex screen (part 1) 81 Table 9: NextGen Sciences human CSF AD 37-plex screen (part 2) 82 Table 10: NextGen Sciences 15-plex plasma screen 83 Table 11: Summary of AD biomarker technologies by company 111 10 Executive summary Introduction ? Alzheimers disease (AD) is the major unmet

18、clinical need in the neurosciences, with the number of patients doubling every 20 years to reach 115.4 million by 2050. The global cost was estimated to be in excess of $600m in 2010. Disease-modifying drugs are urgently required to prevent AD or slow progression. Disease-modifying drugs would have

19、a major impact on both total numbers and the socio- economic cost. ? AD occurs as two forms, namely early-onset or familial AD (FAD) and late-onset or sporadic AD. The gene mutations responsible for FAD have been identified, but in sporadic AD there is no equivalent genetic abnormality. Sporadic AD

20、occurs later in life than FAD. ? FAD is accompanied by increased levels of amyloid beta (A) in the brain, which results in neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration. The “amyloid cascade hypothesis” has been behind most of the research in AD for decades. Several drugs targeting A have reached late-phase c

21、linical trials but unfortunately with disappointing results. ? It is now accepted that AD may occur in three phases. There is an initial preclinical asymptomatic phase in which pathological changes are occurring without visible signs. This is followed by mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and eventuall

22、y increasing loss of function and dementia. ? The preclinical phase may last for decades and if it can be identified with the use of validated biomarkers offers the best opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Biomarkers in Alzheimers disease ? The term biomarker includes data sets acquired based

23、on imaging technology, cognitive assessments, and data from genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabonomics based on body fluids, including blood, CSF, saliva, and urine. 11 ? Differing definitions of biomarkers have been proposed, including diagnostic, prognostic, and pharmacological versio

24、ns. ? Alternative terms include trait, rate, and state biomarkers. Trait biomarkers identify those at risk; state biomarkers correlate with severity of disease; rate biomarkers require repeated measurement and can follow the rate of decline or improvement in disease progression. ? Surrogate biomarke

25、rs once validated can be used as indication that clinical benefit would result. There are no validated surrogate biomarkers in AD. A and tau as biomarkers ? The amyloid hypothesis remains the major focus of research and clinical activity in AD. There is general agreement that MCI and AD are accompan

26、ied by decreased levels of A42 in CSF and an increase in tau/p-tau in CSF. The use of A42 and tau in combination can be used to confirm the diagnosis of probable AD based on cognitive decline and can be used to enrich clinical trial populations where A therapies are under investigation. In addition,

27、 the combination of CSF p-tau and A can distinguish AD from non-AD types of dementia. ? By contrast, attempts to correlate plasma levels of A and tau with stages of AD have provided inconsistent data, and plasma A42 does not appear to represent a useful supporting biomarker to help the diagnosis of

28、AD. Plasma tau, although measurable in traumatic brain injury, is not a valid marker in AD. ? In terms of preclinical diagnostics, neither CSF A nor tau individually, nor in combination, have the power to discriminate normal subjects from those in very early stages of preclinical AD in the absence o

29、f clinical cognitive signs. Changes in A or tau do not appear to represent the very earliest pathological changes in the model of Jack et al. (2010a) and Sperling et al. (2011). ? However, the combination of low A42 and high tau has been accepted as a prognostic marker for progression from MCI to mo

30、re advanced AD. Screening of subjects for clinical trials to enrich the trial 12 population with probable converters has been positively accepted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Genomics and non-genomic factors ? The genetic mutations in APP, PS1, and PS2 responsible for FAD have been well c

31、haracterized and can be used in an accurate predictive manner where a family history of AD exists. ? In sporadic AD, however, only the presence of the APOE 4 allele has a proven strong association with AD. Individuals with two alleles have a 12-fold greater chance of developing AD. However, it canno

32、t be used as a predictive marker since a large number of 4-positive subjects do not develop AD. ? In addition to APOE 4, the application of genome-wide association study (GWAS) and associated next-generation technologies has identified an increasing number of genetic associations. Although several t

33、hese have shown promise as risk factors, to date none has proven accurate or sensitive enough to merit consideration as a diagnostic biomarker to help identify the risk of AD in the preclinical phase or serve as a prognostic marker. ? Elevated blood homocysteine levels are associated with greater ri

34、sk of developing AD and should be measured as part of clinical assessment. Reduction of homocysteine levels is accompanied by decreased brain atrophy and improved cognition. Transcriptomics ? Next-generation sequencing technologies have helped to reveal the complexity of RNA processing. The majority

35、 of the human genome does not code for proteins and until relatively recently it was not appreciated that non-coding RNA (ncRNA) was transcribed. It is now beginning to be understood that the multiple forms of ncRNA are intimately involved in the regulation of gene processing. With regard to AD, num

36、erous examples have been published reporting the involvement of ncRNA in the regulation of A levels. ? ncRNA and other factors are also involved in the regulation of alternative splicing of RNA, resulting in multiple enzyme isoforms with the potential for either gain or loss of function. Our underst

37、anding of the 13 role of alternative splicing in neurodegeneration is at a very early stage and additional studies will be required to establish the role of alternative splicing as a causal factor in AD. ? The importance of epigenetic regulation of gene processing has been understood in oncology for

38、 some time, but the relevance to neurodegeneration has been more slowly appreciated. Histone deacetylation and DNA methylation are the two major epigenetic control processes, and their role in AD will require deep sequencing of samples from longitudinal studies closely correlated with other biomarke

39、r measures to fully understand their importance. With the application of the high-throughput screening, novel therapeutic targets may emerge. ? The so-called “next-generation sequencing” and “next-next generation” will provide the technology to achieve this. While this will undoubtedly provide a dee

40、per understanding of the disease process and may identify additional therapeutic targets, the development of diagnostic targets applicable at a mass screening level would appear some way in the future. In the case of AD, although a number of altered micro inhibitory ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) have b

41、een identified, the development of therapeutic agents is still some way off. Proteomics ? Technological advances in high throughput multiplex proteomics along with improvements in bioinformatics resources have contributed to the development of several multiplex assays. The data obtained has lead to

42、an improved understanding of the pathological changes in AD, and the use of such multiplex assays has the potential to detect presymptomatic AD. ? In particular, the use of mass spectrometry along with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) offers an alternative to antibody-based detector systems. ? Nex

43、tGen Sciences has developed a multiplex assay in CSF for AD and has developed a smaller multiplex blood assay for multiple sclerosis. 14 Biomarkers in saliva and urine ? Saliva is the simplest biological fluid to obtain from a large population, being non-invasive and non- threatening to the subject.

44、 ? Adequate sensitivity and reproducibility of “omics” methodology has been established by use in serum and CSF, and this has allowed transfer of these methodologies to saliva. The saliva proteome and transcriptome has been investigated and biomarkers for oral cancer have been identified. ? Although

45、 further validation of specific biomarkers, or groups of markers, will be required, the potential for salivary diagnostic markers would appear to be significant, particularly at the level of mass screening to identify early-stage disease. At least one group of researchers are actively pursuing this

46、as a strategy. ? In urine, neural thread protein has been identified from patients with AD. Further work could establish this as a valid screening biomarker. Metabonomics ? Metabonomics is the study of small soluble molecules derived from cellular metabolism. These small molecules can be considered

47、the functional consequence of transcriptomics/proteomics, and their measurement provides a snapshot of cellular activity. ? Methodology in metabonomics is still developing and harmonization of sample collection and treatment procedures are required to ensure comparability of data between research gr

48、oups. AD researchers are reluctant to share samples from global collections until methodological issues are resolved. ? Using metabonomic methodology, ethanolamine plasmalogen, a membrane phospholipid involved in synaptic function, has been identified as a potential marker in AD. ? Several patents h

49、ave been published suggesting the use of metabonomic multiplex assays as a screen in CNS indications, including AD, but none have progressed to large scale application. 15 Imaging ? Both MRI- and PET-based imaging modalities have been instrumental in improving our understanding of the disease process in AD in recent years. ? Structural MRI has confirmed that global and regional brain atrophy proceeds at a faster rate in subjects with AD compared with age-matched healthy controls. Similarly, ventricular volume increases at a faster rate in AD. MR

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 其他


经营许可证编号:宁ICP备18001539号-1