《人类将会不会毁于科技（Mankind will not be destroyed by science and technology）.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《人类将会不会毁于科技（Mankind will not be destroyed by science and technology）.doc（13页珍藏版）》请在三一文库上搜索。
1、人类将会不会毁于科技（Mankind will not be destroyed by science and technology）- Affirmative: when the triumph of human science and technology at the same time, please dont forget, the technology also can give the evil spirit to demonic forcesMankind will be destroyed by science and technology, and it is also b
2、ased on modern science and technologys all-round distortion of human development, which is concentrated in three aspects: social relations, spiritual fields and ethicsScience and technology is the protection of human solid shield, we believe that science and technology continue to improve, it will b
3、ring human beings into a more beautiful and mysterious realmHumans will not be destroyed by technology, because the process of technological development shows that MoGaoYiChe, DaoGaoYiZhang, brings about the problem of science and technology, are available through the technology itself, further to s
4、olveWu Tian (a debate Affirmative): first of all, everything has two sides, the benefits of science and technology, I need not waste my breath, while the other argument must however we think is often copious and fluent, to be weakened or even ignored is its negative effects. Unlike other things, the
5、 reverse side of science and technology, such as the blade, and the sword, are the double-edged sword we often call. However, if you think humans have been aware of the existence of a double-edged sword, then you too naive, when a man proudly said, the new technology is applied to the fastest speed,
6、 and show how high we humans efficiency, you may have thought that this also means of science and technology the negative effect of time to understand, or do not want to know, is the originator of the disaster, the devastating technology reflects this trend is not reversed.Second, the uncertainty of
7、 modern scientific and technological development has made the double-edged sword of science and technology become the sword of Damour and Chris. The use of human technology already to the point of accumulation can scarcely wait, month after month and year after year, the role of science and technolo
8、gy is ready to erupt in the world, this is a deeper crisis devastating trend of technology.Third, a high degree of dependence on science and technology, so that Damour, Chriss sword ready. Rely on subjective human technology and highly trust more to the swordany Shiwei, these third trends triggered
9、at any moment, led directly to the science and technology is the destruction of human power, when the triumph of human science and technology at the same time, please dont forget, the technology also can give the evil spirit to demonic forces.Zheng Yu (a debate): first of all, we must point out that
10、 the negative utility cannot blame technology in science and technology, on the contrary, it is not from the whole of human understand the world of science, and unreasonable consequences caused by the use of technology.Second, the opposing friends overestimate the difficulties that science and techn
11、ology bring to mankind, but underestimate the ability of human beings to solve these difficulties. The problems of science and technology which can not be solved for the time being are neither equal nor solved in the future. I think mankind will not be destroyed by technology, because the process of
12、 technological development shows that MoGaoYiChe, DaoGaoYiZhang, brings about the problem of science and technology, are available through the technology itself, further to solve. In 70s, scientists predicted that due to the excessive consumption of natural resources of science and technology produc
13、ts, to the beginning of twenty-first Century mankind will face an energy crisis, and now, micro solar energy development and energy development, make the panic all gone.Third,Technology in the hands of man, human beings can be moral and legal norms to create a scientific system to prevent the negati
14、ve effects, so that one single technical invention brought under control in the whole system.Jian Anjun (square two debate): the other side of the debate that human beings have moral law, but moral law can manage science and technology? Scientists can copy people on the high seas, but morality and l
15、aw can not be managed. We believe that mankind will be destroyed in science and technology, but also based on modern science and technology on human development in all aspects of distortion, which is concentrated in the social relations, spiritual areas and ethics three levels. First of all, the dev
16、elopment trend of science and technology is the potential power to destroy human social life. Secondly, the destructive power of science and technology is also reflected in its constant impact and destruction on human life, which is manifested in the two new human technologies, the Internet and gene
17、 technology. Internet warriors have long announced that the network will become a kind of life, but when the virtual alternative to the real, as a society, the existence of the people will disappear, the so-called leather does not exist, the hair will be attached to it? Look at gene technology, life
18、 technology, treatment of disease, but on the other hand, it is interfering with nature and making more perfect human beings. But is the perfect man of genetically modified human or high-tech products? The last line of defense to change today gene technology to the human inner nature more directly i
19、mpact the human spirit home, ethics, science and technology of human society is a full range of distortions, ruining our social foundation and the spiritual world.Zhang Wenbo (the two debate): just argue each other greatly exaggerated the negative effect of science and technology brings to human bei
20、ngs, although we cannot completely exclude the possibility of high-tech will bring negative effects, but any technological achievements may influence is not equal to the destruction of There are both advantages and disadvantages.First of all, technology is the driving force of human progress.Second,
21、 if there were no technology, man would have died. Science and technology is the most powerful shield to protect mankind. We believe that the continuous improvement of science and technology will bring mankind into a better and mysterious realm, so we believe that mankind will not be destroyed by sc
22、ience and technology.Fu Xin (three Affirmative debate): just friends made two mistakes: first, friends and talk about the benefits of technology copious and fluent, but the benefits we also did not deny, just friends do you really think that water can carry a boat, water will not overturn it? Second
23、, the opponent argued that man is rational, but reason does not mean that he will not perish. I will start with the trend of modern science and technology and demonstrate our proposition.First, the development of science and technology is moving from individual trends to national trends and social t
24、rends. The individual life and the pursuit of science and technology to rely on what is not a big problem, the problem is with this pursuit is dependent on the values in a unique form of national trends and social trends in science and technology has become the worlds only in the right direction, co
25、ntrary to all ideas with which to make way for.Second, the destructive trend of science and technology is highlighted in the fact that science and technology are deified, while nature has been instrumental. It is science and technology that makes mankind no longer feel like a part of nature. It is s
26、cience and technology,Let the human feel holds the new God in the hand, but unceasingly changes the nature tool. However, when the natural order is broken, where will the human race stand?Jetion (three side argue): just argue each other all the mistakes are to blame for science and technology, is on
27、e-sided, there is no real understanding of the relationship between science and humanity, science and technology is not water, human can control technology. The development of everything has its negative side.Next, I will point out our point of view from a realistic point of view. First, the develop
28、ment of high technology makes people get unexpected results, Beijing News, the first robot assisted minimally invasive surgery in Chinese; natural magazine, a nano bovine cell size was born. The results of this kind of technology brought us to a more prosperous starting point.Second, to solve the ex
29、isting problems in our current technology, there is no doubt that many of the problems with the continuous development of science and technology and little to no longer smoothly done or easily solved, waste pollution of the environment, to the energy crisis is no longer worrying.Third, people in the
30、 years after the level of development of science and technology, believe that all of us can not imagine, like the stone age is the earliest humans, they could not imagine, now our world has gas and electricity. Man will not be destroyed by science and technology; on the contrary, science will only m
31、ake man progress more and more.Confrontation- Affirmative: look at the gene technology today, has been in the last line of defense the impact of ethics this human spirit home, how do you do?No: - human beings can not be destroyed by human control technology, science and technologyChen Xiaohuan: woul
32、d you like to talk to the other side of the debate today?Wang Qingmei: of course we are talking about trends, and the trends we are talking about are based on history and reality, finding our basis for the future.Jane: Thank you for allowing us to agree. In the future, of course, we should look at t
33、he trend, make the foundation of reality, judge by the trend, and the destructive trend of science and technology. How can the opposing friends fail to see it?.Jetion: but the other side of the debate is just ignoring history, and we want to prove in history that technology will not destroy mankind.
34、Zheng Yu: the other side of the debate friends, we at least our inference is based on history, and the other side of the debate friends have made a baseless guess, no wonder the other side of the debate friends will use this unscientific approach to draw this unscientific conclusion.Wu: we are clear
35、ly based on reality, look at the trend, the other side of the debate, why not see friends? Are todays technologies developed independently? Is this not a trend of destruction?Wang Qingmei: I would like to ask the other side of the debate friends, you want to do an evaluation of the stock market, you
36、 can not look at past historical data?Chen Xiaohuan: the other party debate friends, today tells us constantly, how good technology, but good and bad coexist, is it impossible? Good and bad coexist, cant it be destroyed?Zheng Yu: we do not deny the existence of good and bad, but we believe that huma
37、n beings can control science and technology, human beings will not be destroyed by science and technology.Jane: if you really think humans can control technology, please tell us exactly how to control it.Wang Qingmei: the other argument has been listed in various negative effects of science and tech
38、nology to bring the risk, and has been still complaining of gene technology, which completely ignores the contribution of gene technology on human made, if the gene technology Nothing is right., why Singapore National Institute of education will spend ten years with transgenic technology developed w
39、orld on the first flower light Hu Qihua? Please give me an explanation.Chen Xiaohuan: we dont deny the benefits of technology, but when I embrace you, cant I stab you? I hold you, and I stab you a knife, there is a contradiction?Zheng Yu: each other friends of the debate so far has been evading our
40、problems, if human beings will be destroyed by technology, the argument is not that the implementation of the government of Singapores five year plan of science and technology is accelerating this destruction?Jane Anjun: the implementation of scientific plan with human beings will be destroyed by te
41、chnology and no contradiction, we stand here today, we want to understand this trend, the other argument has not seen this trend, why after McCain on the trend of the problem?Wang Qingmei: then the opponents opinion is that science and technology are no good. Should we stop developing science and te
42、chnology?Fu Xin: the logic of the opponents friend is strange. On the one hand, he has not realized the existence of the problem. On the other hand, he is asking me how to solve the problem. He will not walk and want to run. Its really strange.Zheng Yu: we feel that it is strange for our friends to
43、argue with each other. On the one hand, we are saying that mankind will be destroyed by science and technology. On the one hand, we should not abandon science and technology and continue to develop science and technology. Is that not contradictory?Wu: we are not contradictory, because people in the
44、trend, have to eat ah, look at the gene technology today, has been in the last line of defense the impact of ethics this human spirit home, how do you do?Wang Qingmei: I would like to ask each other, the scientific quality of the four debater, since science and technology will destroy mankind, then
45、why do we have to work so hard to learn knowledge of science and technology?summary- Affirmative: Science and technology for human convenience but also planted the seeds of destructionNo: - we want to pursue the truth, but not at the individual phenomenon is universal, could not see the world from t
46、he eye of a needle.Wang Qingmei (the four debate): I am here to point out three serious mistakes made by the other argument: first, to the point almost face. One-sided emphasis and exaggeration exaggerate the negative effects of science and technology.Second, because some of the problems that interp
47、ret out of context, science and technology will destroy the human existence in the development of science and technology, completely ignoring the constraints and oriented function of humanistic spirit and ethics of science and technology to.Third, the other is to look at things in the stagnation of
48、the eyes, pointed out the existing problems of science and technology, and we are in the view of development and points out the essence of science and technology innovative, modern technology brings us is the method of change rapidly changes and updates faster to solve the problem.Below I will summa
49、rize our view: first, human beings are rational, otherwise there will be the birth of science and technology, we should seek truth, but not at the individual phenomenon is universal, could not see the world from the eye of a needle.Second, science and technology are controllable. At this point, we have already enumerated a great deal of facts. This is to emphasize tha